Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being

There is a growing literature on the assessment of quality of life (QOL) and subjective well-being (SWB) through composite indicators (CI), obtained by aggregating subjective measures of people well-being. Besides the measurement of elementary indicators, the principal challenges in constructing SWB...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovanni Angelini, Cristina Bernini, Andrea Guizzardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2014-01-01
Series:Statistica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rivista-statistica.unibo.it/article/view/4128
_version_ 1819143125173534720
author Giovanni Angelini
Cristina Bernini
Andrea Guizzardi
author_facet Giovanni Angelini
Cristina Bernini
Andrea Guizzardi
author_sort Giovanni Angelini
collection DOAJ
description There is a growing literature on the assessment of quality of life (QOL) and subjective well-being (SWB) through composite indicators (CI), obtained by aggregating subjective measures of people well-being. Besides the measurement of elementary indicators, the principal challenges in constructing SWB indicator are the aggregation and weighting system. To this respect, literature hasn’t actually reached a unique consensus. The paper investigates the effects that different weighting systems (equally, factorial and DEA weights) have on the rankings and score distributions of the SWB indicators. Data are provide by a sample survey on the quality of life conducted on the residents in the Romagna area during 2010. Results evidence that diverse weighting techniques produce different SWB score distributions while, to a some extent, rankings are maintained.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:21:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c7fda9d64fdd46f89a241856cb2dd334
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0390-590X
1973-2201
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:21:16Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher University of Bologna
record_format Article
series Statistica
spelling doaj.art-c7fda9d64fdd46f89a241856cb2dd3342022-12-21T18:25:58ZengUniversity of BolognaStatistica0390-590X1973-22012014-01-0173214316310.6092/issn.1973-2201/41283791Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-beingGiovanni Angelini0Cristina Bernini1Andrea Guizzardi2Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di BolognaAlma Mater Studiorum - Università di BolognaAlma Mater Studiorum - Università di BolognaThere is a growing literature on the assessment of quality of life (QOL) and subjective well-being (SWB) through composite indicators (CI), obtained by aggregating subjective measures of people well-being. Besides the measurement of elementary indicators, the principal challenges in constructing SWB indicator are the aggregation and weighting system. To this respect, literature hasn’t actually reached a unique consensus. The paper investigates the effects that different weighting systems (equally, factorial and DEA weights) have on the rankings and score distributions of the SWB indicators. Data are provide by a sample survey on the quality of life conducted on the residents in the Romagna area during 2010. Results evidence that diverse weighting techniques produce different SWB score distributions while, to a some extent, rankings are maintained.http://rivista-statistica.unibo.it/article/view/4128Community SWBBottom-up spillover theoryweighting systemrankingRomagna area
spellingShingle Giovanni Angelini
Cristina Bernini
Andrea Guizzardi
Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
Statistica
Community SWB
Bottom-up spillover theory
weighting system
ranking
Romagna area
title Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
title_full Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
title_fullStr Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
title_full_unstemmed Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
title_short Comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well-being
title_sort comparing weighting systems in the measurement of subjective well being
topic Community SWB
Bottom-up spillover theory
weighting system
ranking
Romagna area
url http://rivista-statistica.unibo.it/article/view/4128
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniangelini comparingweightingsystemsinthemeasurementofsubjectivewellbeing
AT cristinabernini comparingweightingsystemsinthemeasurementofsubjectivewellbeing
AT andreaguizzardi comparingweightingsystemsinthemeasurementofsubjectivewellbeing