A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete

Permeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs) are marketed as an option to improve the concrete durability and reduce water ingress in structures. Two categories of PRAs that have become more prominent recently are hydrophobic pore blockers and crystalline waterproofers. A literature review was performed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caitlin M. Tibbetts, Ph.D., Kyle A. Riding, Ph.D., Christopher C. Ferraro, Ph.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Cement
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922100013X
_version_ 1811272651252957184
author Caitlin M. Tibbetts, Ph.D.
Kyle A. Riding, Ph.D.
Christopher C. Ferraro, Ph.D.
author_facet Caitlin M. Tibbetts, Ph.D.
Kyle A. Riding, Ph.D.
Christopher C. Ferraro, Ph.D.
author_sort Caitlin M. Tibbetts, Ph.D.
collection DOAJ
description Permeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs) are marketed as an option to improve the concrete durability and reduce water ingress in structures. Two categories of PRAs that have become more prominent recently are hydrophobic pore blockers and crystalline waterproofers. A literature review was performed to determine the composition, mechanism of action, test methods to indicate durability, and performance of PRAs in concrete, with focus on their use in infrastructure. The test methods for evaluating the performance of PRAs and their effects have varying degrees of frequency and standardization and there is a lack of consistency in the experimental methods used to evaluate PRAs based on the studies found in the literature; the dosage, water to cementitious ratio (w/cm), testing age, and mixture designs were variable. There remains a need for studies with both field and lab data to establish relationships between lab results and field performance to determine laboratory test method validity for PRAs.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:44:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c802025a22574dc9abb8c64d9e241783
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5492
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:44:08Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Cement
spelling doaj.art-c802025a22574dc9abb8c64d9e2417832022-12-22T03:13:37ZengElsevierCement2666-54922021-12-016100016A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concreteCaitlin M. Tibbetts, Ph.D.0Kyle A. Riding, Ph.D.1Christopher C. Ferraro, Ph.D.2Engineer Research and Development Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA; Corresponding author.Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, P.O. Box 116580, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USADepartment of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, P.O. Box 116580, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USAPermeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs) are marketed as an option to improve the concrete durability and reduce water ingress in structures. Two categories of PRAs that have become more prominent recently are hydrophobic pore blockers and crystalline waterproofers. A literature review was performed to determine the composition, mechanism of action, test methods to indicate durability, and performance of PRAs in concrete, with focus on their use in infrastructure. The test methods for evaluating the performance of PRAs and their effects have varying degrees of frequency and standardization and there is a lack of consistency in the experimental methods used to evaluate PRAs based on the studies found in the literature; the dosage, water to cementitious ratio (w/cm), testing age, and mixture designs were variable. There remains a need for studies with both field and lab data to establish relationships between lab results and field performance to determine laboratory test method validity for PRAs.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922100013XPermeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs)Transport propertiesTest methodsCompositionPerformanceConcrete
spellingShingle Caitlin M. Tibbetts, Ph.D.
Kyle A. Riding, Ph.D.
Christopher C. Ferraro, Ph.D.
A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete
Cement
Permeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs)
Transport properties
Test methods
Composition
Performance
Concrete
title A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete
title_full A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete
title_fullStr A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete
title_full_unstemmed A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete
title_short A critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability-reducing admixtures for use in concrete
title_sort critical review of the testing and benefits of permeability reducing admixtures for use in concrete
topic Permeability-reducing admixtures (PRAs)
Transport properties
Test methods
Composition
Performance
Concrete
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922100013X
work_keys_str_mv AT caitlinmtibbettsphd acriticalreviewofthetestingandbenefitsofpermeabilityreducingadmixturesforuseinconcrete
AT kylearidingphd acriticalreviewofthetestingandbenefitsofpermeabilityreducingadmixturesforuseinconcrete
AT christophercferrarophd acriticalreviewofthetestingandbenefitsofpermeabilityreducingadmixturesforuseinconcrete
AT caitlinmtibbettsphd criticalreviewofthetestingandbenefitsofpermeabilityreducingadmixturesforuseinconcrete
AT kylearidingphd criticalreviewofthetestingandbenefitsofpermeabilityreducingadmixturesforuseinconcrete
AT christophercferrarophd criticalreviewofthetestingandbenefitsofpermeabilityreducingadmixturesforuseinconcrete