Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching

Background: This study was designed to assess the microleakage of glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as coronal orifice barrier during walking bleaching. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, endodontic treatment was done for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nafiseh Zarenejad, Saeed Asgary, Nahid Ramazani, Mohammad Reza Haghshenas, Alireza Rafiei, Mohsen Ramazani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=6;spage=581;epage=588;aulast=Zarenejad
_version_ 1817977052371877888
author Nafiseh Zarenejad
Saeed Asgary
Nahid Ramazani
Mohammad Reza Haghshenas
Alireza Rafiei
Mohsen Ramazani
author_facet Nafiseh Zarenejad
Saeed Asgary
Nahid Ramazani
Mohammad Reza Haghshenas
Alireza Rafiei
Mohsen Ramazani
author_sort Nafiseh Zarenejad
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study was designed to assess the microleakage of glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as coronal orifice barrier during walking bleaching. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, endodontic treatment was done for 70 extracted human incisors without canal calcification, caries, restoration, resorption, or cracks. The teeth were then divided into three experimental using "Simple randomization allocation" (n = 20) and two control groups (n = 5). The three cements were applied as 3-mm intra-orifice barrier in test groups, and bleaching process was then conducted using a mixture of sodium perborate powder and distilled water, for 9 days. For leakage evaluation, bovine serum albumin marker was traced in a dual-chamber technique with Bradford indicator. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean ± standard deviation leakage of samples from negative control, positive control, GI, MTA, and CEM cement groups were 0.0, 8.9 ± 0.03, 0.47 ± 0.02, 0.48 ± 0.02, and 0.49 ± 0.02 mg/mL, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between three experimental groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It is concluded that GI, MTA, and CEM cements are considered as suitable intra-orifice barrier to provide coronal seal during walking bleaching.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T22:11:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c802787e077d431cb11c443a2157acec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T22:11:06Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Dental Research Journal
spelling doaj.art-c802787e077d431cb11c443a2157acec2022-12-22T02:27:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552015-01-0112658158810.4103/1735-3327.170582Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleachingNafiseh ZarenejadSaeed AsgaryNahid RamazaniMohammad Reza HaghshenasAlireza RafieiMohsen RamazaniBackground: This study was designed to assess the microleakage of glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as coronal orifice barrier during walking bleaching. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, endodontic treatment was done for 70 extracted human incisors without canal calcification, caries, restoration, resorption, or cracks. The teeth were then divided into three experimental using "Simple randomization allocation" (n = 20) and two control groups (n = 5). The three cements were applied as 3-mm intra-orifice barrier in test groups, and bleaching process was then conducted using a mixture of sodium perborate powder and distilled water, for 9 days. For leakage evaluation, bovine serum albumin marker was traced in a dual-chamber technique with Bradford indicator. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean ± standard deviation leakage of samples from negative control, positive control, GI, MTA, and CEM cement groups were 0.0, 8.9 ± 0.03, 0.47 ± 0.02, 0.48 ± 0.02, and 0.49 ± 0.02 mg/mL, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between three experimental groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It is concluded that GI, MTA, and CEM cements are considered as suitable intra-orifice barrier to provide coronal seal during walking bleaching.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=6;spage=581;epage=588;aulast=ZarenejadCalcium enriched mixture cementcoronal barriernonvital bleachingRMGICWMTA
spellingShingle Nafiseh Zarenejad
Saeed Asgary
Nahid Ramazani
Mohammad Reza Haghshenas
Alireza Rafiei
Mohsen Ramazani
Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
Dental Research Journal
Calcium enriched mixture cement
coronal barrier
nonvital bleaching
RMGIC
WMTA
title Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_full Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_fullStr Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_full_unstemmed Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_short Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_sort coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
topic Calcium enriched mixture cement
coronal barrier
nonvital bleaching
RMGIC
WMTA
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=6;spage=581;epage=588;aulast=Zarenejad
work_keys_str_mv AT nafisehzarenejad coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT saeedasgary coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT nahidramazani coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT mohammadrezahaghshenas coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT alirezarafiei coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT mohsenramazani coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching