Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance

Abstract Background Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lea Anna Lisa Dejonghe, Kevin Rudolf, Jennifer Becker, Gerrit Stassen, Ingo Froboese, Andrea Schaller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4
_version_ 1818387963231338496
author Lea Anna Lisa Dejonghe
Kevin Rudolf
Jennifer Becker
Gerrit Stassen
Ingo Froboese
Andrea Schaller
author_facet Lea Anna Lisa Dejonghe
Kevin Rudolf
Jennifer Becker
Gerrit Stassen
Ingo Froboese
Andrea Schaller
author_sort Lea Anna Lisa Dejonghe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected. Methods A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied. Results Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as “good”. 34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant. The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4–88.2 out of 100). Conclusion Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high. Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:18:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c802a693b1444937b6ff654b82a0be90
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-1847
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:18:17Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-c802a693b1444937b6ff654b82a0be902022-12-21T23:17:28ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472020-02-011211810.1186/s13102-019-0154-4Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptanceLea Anna Lisa Dejonghe0Kevin Rudolf1Jennifer Becker2Gerrit Stassen3Ingo Froboese4Andrea Schaller5Institute of Movement Therapy and Movement-Orientated Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University CologneInstitute of Movement Therapy and Movement-Orientated Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University CologneDepartment of Community Health, University of Applied SciencesInstitute of Movement Therapy and Movement-Orientated Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University CologneInstitute of Movement Therapy and Movement-Orientated Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University CologneInstitute of Movement Therapy and Movement-Orientated Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University CologneAbstract Background Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected. Methods A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied. Results Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as “good”. 34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant. The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4–88.2 out of 100). Conclusion Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high. Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4UsageAcceptancePromoting physical activityHealth coachFace-to-face contactTelephone coaching
spellingShingle Lea Anna Lisa Dejonghe
Kevin Rudolf
Jennifer Becker
Gerrit Stassen
Ingo Froboese
Andrea Schaller
Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Usage
Acceptance
Promoting physical activity
Health coach
Face-to-face contact
Telephone coaching
title Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_full Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_fullStr Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_full_unstemmed Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_short Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_sort health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
topic Usage
Acceptance
Promoting physical activity
Health coach
Face-to-face contact
Telephone coaching
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4
work_keys_str_mv AT leaannalisadejonghe healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT kevinrudolf healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT jenniferbecker healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT gerritstassen healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT ingofroboese healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT andreaschaller healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance