Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Introduction:. Postoperative seroma and pain are common problems following laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair of ventral hernias. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by dissecting and using the peritoneum in the hernial sac to bridge the hernia defect. Methods:. This was a patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fathalla Ali, MD, FRCS, Gabriel Sandblom, MD, Bianka Forgo, MD, PhD, Göran Wallin, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-03-01
Series:Annals of Surgery Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257
_version_ 1827856041146056704
author Fathalla Ali, MD, FRCS
Gabriel Sandblom, MD
Bianka Forgo, MD, PhD
Göran Wallin, MD
author_facet Fathalla Ali, MD, FRCS
Gabriel Sandblom, MD
Bianka Forgo, MD, PhD
Göran Wallin, MD
author_sort Fathalla Ali, MD, FRCS
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:. Postoperative seroma and pain are common problems following laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair of ventral hernias. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by dissecting and using the peritoneum in the hernial sac to bridge the hernia defect. Methods:. This was a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, parallel-design, randomized controlled trial comparing nonclosure and peritoneal bridging approaches in patients scheduled for elective midline ventral hernia repair. The primary endpoint was seroma volume on ultrasonography. The secondary endpoints were postoperative pain, recurrence, and complications. Results:. Between November 2018 and December 2020, 112 patients were randomized, of whom 60 were in the nonclosure group and 52 were in the peritoneal bridging group. The seroma volume in the nonclosure and peritoneal bridging groups were 17 cm3 (6–53 cm3) versus 0 cm3 (0–26 cm3) at 1-month follow-up (P = 0.013). The median volume was zero at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in both groups. No significant differences were observed in early postoperative pain (P = 0.447) and in recurrence rate (P = 0.684). There were 4 (7%) and 1 (2%) perioperative complications that lead to reoperations in simple IPOM (sIPOM) and IPOM with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb), respectively. Conclusions:. Seroma was less prevalent after IPOM-pb at 1-month follow-up compared with sIPOM, with similar postoperative pain 1 week after index surgery in both groups. At subsequent follow-ups, the differences in seroma were not statistically significant. Further studies are required to confirm these results. Trial registration (NCT04229940).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:19:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c807922aa6db4a6d9c8b356c935242bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2691-3593
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:19:06Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format Article
series Annals of Surgery Open
spelling doaj.art-c807922aa6db4a6d9c8b356c935242bb2023-08-30T06:10:49ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932023-03-0141e25710.1097/AS9.0000000000000257202303000-00022Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia RepairFathalla Ali, MD, FRCS0Gabriel Sandblom, MD1Bianka Forgo, MD, PhD2Göran Wallin, MD3From the * Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden‡ Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden‖ Department of Radiology, Örebro University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.From the * Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, SwedenIntroduction:. Postoperative seroma and pain are common problems following laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair of ventral hernias. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by dissecting and using the peritoneum in the hernial sac to bridge the hernia defect. Methods:. This was a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, parallel-design, randomized controlled trial comparing nonclosure and peritoneal bridging approaches in patients scheduled for elective midline ventral hernia repair. The primary endpoint was seroma volume on ultrasonography. The secondary endpoints were postoperative pain, recurrence, and complications. Results:. Between November 2018 and December 2020, 112 patients were randomized, of whom 60 were in the nonclosure group and 52 were in the peritoneal bridging group. The seroma volume in the nonclosure and peritoneal bridging groups were 17 cm3 (6–53 cm3) versus 0 cm3 (0–26 cm3) at 1-month follow-up (P = 0.013). The median volume was zero at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in both groups. No significant differences were observed in early postoperative pain (P = 0.447) and in recurrence rate (P = 0.684). There were 4 (7%) and 1 (2%) perioperative complications that lead to reoperations in simple IPOM (sIPOM) and IPOM with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb), respectively. Conclusions:. Seroma was less prevalent after IPOM-pb at 1-month follow-up compared with sIPOM, with similar postoperative pain 1 week after index surgery in both groups. At subsequent follow-ups, the differences in seroma were not statistically significant. Further studies are required to confirm these results. Trial registration (NCT04229940).http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257
spellingShingle Fathalla Ali, MD, FRCS
Gabriel Sandblom, MD
Bianka Forgo, MD, PhD
Göran Wallin, MD
Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
Annals of Surgery Open
title Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
title_full Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
title_fullStr Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
title_full_unstemmed Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
title_short Peritoneal Bridging Versus Nonclosure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
title_sort peritoneal bridging versus nonclosure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000257
work_keys_str_mv AT fathallaalimdfrcs peritonealbridgingversusnonclosureinlaparoscopicventralherniarepair
AT gabrielsandblommd peritonealbridgingversusnonclosureinlaparoscopicventralherniarepair
AT biankaforgomdphd peritonealbridgingversusnonclosureinlaparoscopicventralherniarepair
AT goranwallinmd peritonealbridgingversusnonclosureinlaparoscopicventralherniarepair