Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball

Momentum is often cited in the media and in other sources as an important factor in performance over time in business, politics, sports and other areas. Yet, academic research on whether momentum actually exists is mixed. This study aims to assess momentum perceptions in a context in which momentum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elia Morgulev, Alisa Voslinsky, Ofer H. Azar, Michael Bar-Eli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-07-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190502b/jdm190502b.pdf
_version_ 1797719451288731648
author Elia Morgulev
Alisa Voslinsky
Ofer H. Azar
Michael Bar-Eli
author_facet Elia Morgulev
Alisa Voslinsky
Ofer H. Azar
Michael Bar-Eli
author_sort Elia Morgulev
collection DOAJ
description Momentum is often cited in the media and in other sources as an important factor in performance over time in business, politics, sports and other areas. Yet, academic research on whether momentum actually exists is mixed. This study aims to assess momentum perceptions in a context in which momentum could be relevant, but where empirical data have shown that no momentum exists. In particular, we take the scenario of a basketball game that is tied at the end of regulation time. We designed questionnaires where one of the teams closed a moderate or a large score gap during the last few minutes of the fourth quarter (and in a control treatment, the score was balanced during these minutes). In the first study, 107 fans and 73 practitioners answered these questionnaires. Then, in the second study, 250 additional respondents completed questionnaires containing the same game scenarios but with additional ``opposite-framing'' versions and a set of questions regarding the reasons for momentum-based beliefs. The respondents also answered several questions about their level of knowledge and interest in basketball, which allowed us to categorize them to fans and laymen. The responses revealed that coming back into the game by reducing a significant score gap during the final minutes of regular time was perceived to increase the teams' chances to win in overtime (which can be interpreted as a positive momentum). Fans exhibit stronger momentum beliefs compared to laymen. Overall, respondents' perceptions contradict the existing empirical evidence that shows that the comeback team does not have higher chances to win the game in overtime. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy between the perceptions we observed and the empirical data.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:05:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c80acab06cba4b778327f21c79f95605
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:05:04Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-c80acab06cba4b778327f21c79f956052023-09-02T15:24:13ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752020-07-01154545560Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketballElia MorgulevAlisa VoslinskyOfer H. AzarMichael Bar-EliMomentum is often cited in the media and in other sources as an important factor in performance over time in business, politics, sports and other areas. Yet, academic research on whether momentum actually exists is mixed. This study aims to assess momentum perceptions in a context in which momentum could be relevant, but where empirical data have shown that no momentum exists. In particular, we take the scenario of a basketball game that is tied at the end of regulation time. We designed questionnaires where one of the teams closed a moderate or a large score gap during the last few minutes of the fourth quarter (and in a control treatment, the score was balanced during these minutes). In the first study, 107 fans and 73 practitioners answered these questionnaires. Then, in the second study, 250 additional respondents completed questionnaires containing the same game scenarios but with additional ``opposite-framing'' versions and a set of questions regarding the reasons for momentum-based beliefs. The respondents also answered several questions about their level of knowledge and interest in basketball, which allowed us to categorize them to fans and laymen. The responses revealed that coming back into the game by reducing a significant score gap during the final minutes of regular time was perceived to increase the teams' chances to win in overtime (which can be interpreted as a positive momentum). Fans exhibit stronger momentum beliefs compared to laymen. Overall, respondents' perceptions contradict the existing empirical evidence that shows that the comeback team does not have higher chances to win the game in overtime. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy between the perceptions we observed and the empirical data.http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190502b/jdm190502b.pdfsuccess breeds success momentum basketball judgment perceptionsnakeywords
spellingShingle Elia Morgulev
Alisa Voslinsky
Ofer H. Azar
Michael Bar-Eli
Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
Judgment and Decision Making
success breeds success
momentum
basketball
judgment
perceptionsnakeywords
title Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
title_full Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
title_fullStr Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
title_full_unstemmed Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
title_short Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
title_sort biased perceptions about momentum do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball
topic success breeds success
momentum
basketball
judgment
perceptionsnakeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190502b/jdm190502b.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eliamorgulev biasedperceptionsaboutmomentumdocomebackteamshavehigherchancestowininbasketball
AT alisavoslinsky biasedperceptionsaboutmomentumdocomebackteamshavehigherchancestowininbasketball
AT oferhazar biasedperceptionsaboutmomentumdocomebackteamshavehigherchancestowininbasketball
AT michaelbareli biasedperceptionsaboutmomentumdocomebackteamshavehigherchancestowininbasketball