Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure

Borderline resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) is associated with adverse outcomes and affects the exercise pulmonary vascular response. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying exertional intolerance in borderline mPAP remain incompletely characterized. In the current study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rudolf K. F. Oliveira, Mariana Faria-Urbina, Bradley A. Maron, Mario Santos, Aaron B. Waxman, David M. Systrom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-06-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2045893217709025
_version_ 1811230214336806912
author Rudolf K. F. Oliveira
Mariana Faria-Urbina
Bradley A. Maron
Mario Santos
Aaron B. Waxman
David M. Systrom
author_facet Rudolf K. F. Oliveira
Mariana Faria-Urbina
Bradley A. Maron
Mario Santos
Aaron B. Waxman
David M. Systrom
author_sort Rudolf K. F. Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description Borderline resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) is associated with adverse outcomes and affects the exercise pulmonary vascular response. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying exertional intolerance in borderline mPAP remain incompletely characterized. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the prevalence and functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension (ePH) across a spectrum of resting mPAP’s in consecutive patients with contemporary resting right heart catheterization (RHC) and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Patients with resting mPAP <25 mmHg and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg (n = 312) were stratified by mPAP < 13, 13–16, 17–20, and 21–24 mmHg. Those with ePH (n = 35) were compared with resting precapillary pulmonary hypertension (rPH; n = 16) and to those with normal hemodynamics (non-PH; n = 224). ePH prevalence was 6%, 8%, and 27% for resting mPAP 13–16, 17–20, and 21–24 mmHg, respectively. Within each of these resting mPAP epochs, ePH negatively impacted exercise capacity compared with non-PH (peak oxygen uptake 70 ± 16% versus 92 ± 19% predicted, P  < 0.01; 72 ± 13% versus 86 ± 17% predicted, P  < 0.05; and 64 ± 15% versus 82 ± 19% predicted, P  < 0.001, respectively). Overall, ePH and rPH had similar functional limitation (peak oxygen uptake 67 ± 15% versus 68 ± 17% predicted, P  > 0.05) and similar underlying mechanisms of exercise intolerance compared with non-PH (peak oxygen delivery 1868 ± 599 mL/min versus 1756 ± 720 mL/min versus 2482 ± 875 mL/min, respectively; P  < 0.05), associated with chronotropic incompetence, increased right ventricular afterload and signs of right ventricular/pulmonary vascular uncoupling. In conclusion, ePH is most frequently found in borderline mPAP, reducing exercise capacity in a manner similar to rPH. When borderline mPAP is identified at RHC, evaluation of the pulmonary circulation under the stress of exercise is warranted.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:26:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c81971096e71461dba5c3e109f731764
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8940
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:26:25Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj.art-c81971096e71461dba5c3e109f7317642022-12-22T03:36:58ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402017-06-01710.1177/2045893217709025Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressureRudolf K. F. Oliveira0Mariana Faria-Urbina1Bradley A. Maron2Mario Santos3Aaron B. Waxman4David M. Systrom5Division of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, BrazilHeart & Vascular Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USAVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USADepartment of Physiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular R&D Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, PortugalHeart & Vascular Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USAHeart & Vascular Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USABorderline resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) is associated with adverse outcomes and affects the exercise pulmonary vascular response. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying exertional intolerance in borderline mPAP remain incompletely characterized. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the prevalence and functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension (ePH) across a spectrum of resting mPAP’s in consecutive patients with contemporary resting right heart catheterization (RHC) and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Patients with resting mPAP <25 mmHg and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg (n = 312) were stratified by mPAP < 13, 13–16, 17–20, and 21–24 mmHg. Those with ePH (n = 35) were compared with resting precapillary pulmonary hypertension (rPH; n = 16) and to those with normal hemodynamics (non-PH; n = 224). ePH prevalence was 6%, 8%, and 27% for resting mPAP 13–16, 17–20, and 21–24 mmHg, respectively. Within each of these resting mPAP epochs, ePH negatively impacted exercise capacity compared with non-PH (peak oxygen uptake 70 ± 16% versus 92 ± 19% predicted, P  < 0.01; 72 ± 13% versus 86 ± 17% predicted, P  < 0.05; and 64 ± 15% versus 82 ± 19% predicted, P  < 0.001, respectively). Overall, ePH and rPH had similar functional limitation (peak oxygen uptake 67 ± 15% versus 68 ± 17% predicted, P  > 0.05) and similar underlying mechanisms of exercise intolerance compared with non-PH (peak oxygen delivery 1868 ± 599 mL/min versus 1756 ± 720 mL/min versus 2482 ± 875 mL/min, respectively; P  < 0.05), associated with chronotropic incompetence, increased right ventricular afterload and signs of right ventricular/pulmonary vascular uncoupling. In conclusion, ePH is most frequently found in borderline mPAP, reducing exercise capacity in a manner similar to rPH. When borderline mPAP is identified at RHC, evaluation of the pulmonary circulation under the stress of exercise is warranted.https://doi.org/10.1177/2045893217709025
spellingShingle Rudolf K. F. Oliveira
Mariana Faria-Urbina
Bradley A. Maron
Mario Santos
Aaron B. Waxman
David M. Systrom
Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
Pulmonary Circulation
title Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
title_full Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
title_fullStr Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
title_full_unstemmed Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
title_short Functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
title_sort functional impact of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with borderline resting pulmonary arterial pressure
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2045893217709025
work_keys_str_mv AT rudolfkfoliveira functionalimpactofexercisepulmonaryhypertensioninpatientswithborderlinerestingpulmonaryarterialpressure
AT marianafariaurbina functionalimpactofexercisepulmonaryhypertensioninpatientswithborderlinerestingpulmonaryarterialpressure
AT bradleyamaron functionalimpactofexercisepulmonaryhypertensioninpatientswithborderlinerestingpulmonaryarterialpressure
AT mariosantos functionalimpactofexercisepulmonaryhypertensioninpatientswithborderlinerestingpulmonaryarterialpressure
AT aaronbwaxman functionalimpactofexercisepulmonaryhypertensioninpatientswithborderlinerestingpulmonaryarterialpressure
AT davidmsystrom functionalimpactofexercisepulmonaryhypertensioninpatientswithborderlinerestingpulmonaryarterialpressure