Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings

Cavitation has a potential effect on the performance of full circle journal bearings. This paper studied the effects of cavitation on steadily loaded journal bearings, with the purpose of analyzing the necessity of adopting a mass-conserving model for ordinary journal bearings. The Christopherson’s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wanjun Xu, Shanhui Zhao, Yaoyao Xu, Kang Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Lubricants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/9/11/111
_version_ 1797509673402761216
author Wanjun Xu
Shanhui Zhao
Yaoyao Xu
Kang Li
author_facet Wanjun Xu
Shanhui Zhao
Yaoyao Xu
Kang Li
author_sort Wanjun Xu
collection DOAJ
description Cavitation has a potential effect on the performance of full circle journal bearings. This paper studied the effects of cavitation on steadily loaded journal bearings, with the purpose of analyzing the necessity of adopting a mass-conserving model for ordinary journal bearings. The Christopherson’s method and Elrod cavitation algorithm were implemented to represent the non-mass-conserving Reynolds model and the mass-conserving Jakobsson-Floberg-Olsson (JFO) theory, respectively. The difference in the oil film reformation boundaries predicted by the two methods was focused on. The typical performance parameters including oil film pressure, load-carrying capacity, attitude angle, friction force, and leakage were comprehensively compared. The results show that the load-carrying capacity is improved by the decrease in cavitation pressure, and the effect is significant in lightly loaded cavitated bearings. In non-cavitated cases and the cavitated cases with intermediate and heavy loads, the difference between the Reynolds model and the JFO theory can be effectively ignored, but the accuracy of the leakage predicted using the Reynolds model should be carefully evaluated.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:21:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c81cf7f948d54d1788617831f6757c28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4442
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:21:05Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Lubricants
spelling doaj.art-c81cf7f948d54d1788617831f6757c282023-11-23T00:05:41ZengMDPI AGLubricants2075-44422021-11-0191111110.3390/lubricants9110111Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal BearingsWanjun Xu0Shanhui Zhao1Yaoyao Xu2Kang Li3School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, ChinaSchool of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, ChinaCavitation has a potential effect on the performance of full circle journal bearings. This paper studied the effects of cavitation on steadily loaded journal bearings, with the purpose of analyzing the necessity of adopting a mass-conserving model for ordinary journal bearings. The Christopherson’s method and Elrod cavitation algorithm were implemented to represent the non-mass-conserving Reynolds model and the mass-conserving Jakobsson-Floberg-Olsson (JFO) theory, respectively. The difference in the oil film reformation boundaries predicted by the two methods was focused on. The typical performance parameters including oil film pressure, load-carrying capacity, attitude angle, friction force, and leakage were comprehensively compared. The results show that the load-carrying capacity is improved by the decrease in cavitation pressure, and the effect is significant in lightly loaded cavitated bearings. In non-cavitated cases and the cavitated cases with intermediate and heavy loads, the difference between the Reynolds model and the JFO theory can be effectively ignored, but the accuracy of the leakage predicted using the Reynolds model should be carefully evaluated.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/9/11/111cavitationJFO theoryElrod algorithmReynolds boundary conditionjournal bearing
spellingShingle Wanjun Xu
Shanhui Zhao
Yaoyao Xu
Kang Li
Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings
Lubricants
cavitation
JFO theory
Elrod algorithm
Reynolds boundary condition
journal bearing
title Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings
title_full Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings
title_fullStr Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings
title_full_unstemmed Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings
title_short Reynolds Model versus JFO Theory in Steadily Loaded Journal Bearings
title_sort reynolds model versus jfo theory in steadily loaded journal bearings
topic cavitation
JFO theory
Elrod algorithm
Reynolds boundary condition
journal bearing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/9/11/111
work_keys_str_mv AT wanjunxu reynoldsmodelversusjfotheoryinsteadilyloadedjournalbearings
AT shanhuizhao reynoldsmodelversusjfotheoryinsteadilyloadedjournalbearings
AT yaoyaoxu reynoldsmodelversusjfotheoryinsteadilyloadedjournalbearings
AT kangli reynoldsmodelversusjfotheoryinsteadilyloadedjournalbearings