TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )

The observed volumes obtained by several volume calculation methods for the butt log volume of Calibrain pine (<em>Pinus brutia </em>Ten.). These butt logs were compared with true volume of each butt log which was determined by aggregating the volumes of measured short (1m) using Smalian...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammed Obeyed
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: College of Agriculture 2019-10-01
Series:Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://magrj.mosuljournals.com/article_161325_abfd85b5479ec9cbce7ef1f3ef3762df.pdf
_version_ 1818392066670985216
author Mohammed Obeyed
author_facet Mohammed Obeyed
author_sort Mohammed Obeyed
collection DOAJ
description The observed volumes obtained by several volume calculation methods for the butt log volume of Calibrain pine (<em>Pinus brutia </em>Ten.). These butt logs were compared with true volume of each butt log which was determined by aggregating the volumes of measured short (1m) using Smalian’s formula. 150 of sample trees were measured into Zaweta and Atrush districts of Dohuk province. The sample trees presented diameter at breast height from 13.9 to 37.6 cm. and total height from 8 - 19.2 meter.The volume of each butt log was estimated by using (Smalian’s, Huber’s, Newton’s, Hossfeld’s, Bruce’s, Sorenson’s and Centroid method). The accuracy of these seven procedures was analyzed considering volume of butt log lengths 6-m. The results showed that Centroid method was superior for all volumes. As expected, Sorenson formula was the procedure with the worst performance. <br /> <strong><span style="mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-bidi; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-bidi; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-bidi;">TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( <em>Pinus brutia</em> Ten )</span></strong><br />
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:23:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c81df2491fd64807b620e7bc1fec7df2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1815-316X
2224-9796
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:23:31Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher College of Agriculture
record_format Article
series Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-c81df2491fd64807b620e7bc1fec7df22022-12-21T23:15:35ZaraCollege of AgricultureMesopotamia Journal of Agriculture1815-316X2224-97962019-10-0145332133010.33899/magrj.2019.161325161325TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )Mohammed Obeyed0School of Forestry / Faculty of Agriculture & Forestry / Dohuk Univ., IraqThe observed volumes obtained by several volume calculation methods for the butt log volume of Calibrain pine (<em>Pinus brutia </em>Ten.). These butt logs were compared with true volume of each butt log which was determined by aggregating the volumes of measured short (1m) using Smalian’s formula. 150 of sample trees were measured into Zaweta and Atrush districts of Dohuk province. The sample trees presented diameter at breast height from 13.9 to 37.6 cm. and total height from 8 - 19.2 meter.The volume of each butt log was estimated by using (Smalian’s, Huber’s, Newton’s, Hossfeld’s, Bruce’s, Sorenson’s and Centroid method). The accuracy of these seven procedures was analyzed considering volume of butt log lengths 6-m. The results showed that Centroid method was superior for all volumes. As expected, Sorenson formula was the procedure with the worst performance. <br /> <strong><span style="mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-bidi; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-bidi; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-bidi;">TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( <em>Pinus brutia</em> Ten )</span></strong><br />https://magrj.mosuljournals.com/article_161325_abfd85b5479ec9cbce7ef1f3ef3762df.pdfbutt log volumecentroid methodindividual tree volumelog volumestem volume formula
spellingShingle Mohammed Obeyed
TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )
Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture
butt log volume
centroid method
individual tree volume
log volume
stem volume formula
title TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )
title_full TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )
title_fullStr TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )
title_full_unstemmed TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )
title_short TESTING ACCURACY OF BUTT LOG VOLUME ESTIMATED BY USING SEVEN FORMULAS FOR CALIBRAIN PINE ( Pinus brutia Ten )
title_sort testing accuracy of butt log volume estimated by using seven formulas for calibrain pine pinus brutia ten
topic butt log volume
centroid method
individual tree volume
log volume
stem volume formula
url https://magrj.mosuljournals.com/article_161325_abfd85b5479ec9cbce7ef1f3ef3762df.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedobeyed testingaccuracyofbuttlogvolumeestimatedbyusingsevenformulasforcalibrainpinepinusbrutiaten