Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies

Threatened by climate change, governments the world over are attempting to nudge markets in the direction of less carbon-intensive energy. Perversely, many of these governments continue to subsidize fossil fuels, distorting markets and raising emissions. Determining how much money is involved is di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radoslaw (Radek) Stefanski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2016-03-01
Series:The School of Public Policy Publications
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42575
_version_ 1797844008908619776
author Radoslaw (Radek) Stefanski
author_facet Radoslaw (Radek) Stefanski
author_sort Radoslaw (Radek) Stefanski
collection DOAJ
description Threatened by climate change, governments the world over are attempting to nudge markets in the direction of less carbon-intensive energy. Perversely, many of these governments continue to subsidize fossil fuels, distorting markets and raising emissions. Determining how much money is involved is difficult, as neither the providers nor the recipients of those subsidies want to own up to them. This paper builds on a unique method to extract fossil fuel subsidies from patterns in countries’ carbon emission-to-GDP ratios. This approach is useful since it: 1) overcomes the problem of scarce data; 2) derives a wider and more comparable measure of subsidies than existing measures and 3) allows for the performance of counterfactuals which help measure the impact of subsidies on emissions and growth. The resultant 170-country, 30-year database finds that the financial and the environmental costs of such subsidies are enormous, especially in China and the U.S. The overwhelming majority of the world’s fossil fuel subsidies stem from China, the U.S. and the ex-USSR; as of 2010, this figure was $712 billion or nearly 80 per cent of the total world value of subsidies. For its part, Canada has been subsidizing rather than taxing fossil fuels since 1998. By 2010, Canadian subsidies sat at $13 billion, or 1.4 per cent of GDP. In that same year, the total global direct and indirect financial costs of all such subsidies amounted to $1.82 trillion, or 3.8 per cent of global GDP. Aside from the money saved, in 2010 a world without subsidies would have had carbon emissions 36 per cent lower than they actually were. Any government looking to ease strained budgets and make a significant (and cheap) contribution to the fight against climate change must consider slashing fossil fuel subsidies. As the data show, this is a sound decision – fiscally and environmentally.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:15:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c82116bb66c3400ba32c4f97eb861e41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2560-8312
2560-8320
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:15:31Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher University of Calgary
record_format Article
series The School of Public Policy Publications
spelling doaj.art-c82116bb66c3400ba32c4f97eb861e412023-04-20T04:05:58ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202016-03-019Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidiesRadoslaw (Radek) Stefanski0University of St Andrews Threatened by climate change, governments the world over are attempting to nudge markets in the direction of less carbon-intensive energy. Perversely, many of these governments continue to subsidize fossil fuels, distorting markets and raising emissions. Determining how much money is involved is difficult, as neither the providers nor the recipients of those subsidies want to own up to them. This paper builds on a unique method to extract fossil fuel subsidies from patterns in countries’ carbon emission-to-GDP ratios. This approach is useful since it: 1) overcomes the problem of scarce data; 2) derives a wider and more comparable measure of subsidies than existing measures and 3) allows for the performance of counterfactuals which help measure the impact of subsidies on emissions and growth. The resultant 170-country, 30-year database finds that the financial and the environmental costs of such subsidies are enormous, especially in China and the U.S. The overwhelming majority of the world’s fossil fuel subsidies stem from China, the U.S. and the ex-USSR; as of 2010, this figure was $712 billion or nearly 80 per cent of the total world value of subsidies. For its part, Canada has been subsidizing rather than taxing fossil fuels since 1998. By 2010, Canadian subsidies sat at $13 billion, or 1.4 per cent of GDP. In that same year, the total global direct and indirect financial costs of all such subsidies amounted to $1.82 trillion, or 3.8 per cent of global GDP. Aside from the money saved, in 2010 a world without subsidies would have had carbon emissions 36 per cent lower than they actually were. Any government looking to ease strained budgets and make a significant (and cheap) contribution to the fight against climate change must consider slashing fossil fuel subsidies. As the data show, this is a sound decision – fiscally and environmentally. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42575
spellingShingle Radoslaw (Radek) Stefanski
Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
The School of Public Policy Publications
title Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
title_full Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
title_fullStr Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
title_full_unstemmed Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
title_short Into the mire: A closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
title_sort into the mire a closer look at fossil fuel subsidies
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42575
work_keys_str_mv AT radoslawradekstefanski intothemireacloserlookatfossilfuelsubsidies