Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic discordance of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Chinese elderly men. Methods: A total of 313 males older than 60 years, who underwent both spinal QCT and lumba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-ming Xu, Na Li, Kai Li, Xiao-Yu Li, Ping Zhang, Yan-jiao Xuan, Xiao-guang Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X18300925
_version_ 1818198276569038848
author Xiao-ming Xu
Na Li
Kai Li
Xiao-Yu Li
Ping Zhang
Yan-jiao Xuan
Xiao-guang Cheng
author_facet Xiao-ming Xu
Na Li
Kai Li
Xiao-Yu Li
Ping Zhang
Yan-jiao Xuan
Xiao-guang Cheng
author_sort Xiao-ming Xu
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic discordance of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Chinese elderly men. Methods: A total of 313 males older than 60 years, who underwent both spinal QCT and lumbar spine and hip DXA in our department, were included. The diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organisation in 1994 were used for DXA to diagnose osteoporosis, and the criteria recommended by the International Society of Clinical Densitometry were used for QCT. The osteoporosis detection rate by the two techniques was calculated, and the difference was compared. The minor discordance was considered present when the different diagnostic classes between the two techniques were adjacent. Major discordance was present when the diagnosis by one technique was osteoporosis and the other was normal. The computed tomography images were reviewed by radiologists to assess whether vertebral fracture, aorta calcification or degeneration was present. Results: In the 313 participants (mean age, 79.6 ± 7.2 years), the osteoporosis detection rate was 10.9% for DXA (lumbar spine and hip) and 45.1% for QCT, a significant difference (p < 0.001). The major discordance, minor discordance and concordance of diagnosis between the two techniques were seen in 8.3%, 50.8% and 40.9%, respectively. QCT detected osteoporosis better than DXA. The causes of this discordance were degeneration of spine, abdominal aorta calcification and vertebral fractures. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that discordance was common when using QCT and DXA to diagnose osteoporosis and that spinal degeneration, aorta calcification and fracture obscure the bone mineral density measurement of spine by DXA. QCT is a more sensitive method of choice to identify osteoporosis in elderly Chinese men. The translational potential of this article: This study investigated the diagnostic discordance of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Chinese elderly men. The results demonstrated that QCT is a more sensitive method of choice to identify osteoporosis in elderly Chinese men. This work may help clinicians make an appropriate choice of technique for the accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis and identify the patients at high risk of osteoporosis who should be treated early to prevent fractures. This may influence the therapeutic plan and the overall prognosis of patients. Keywords: Bone mineral density, Dual X-ray absorptiometry, Osteoporosis, Quantitative computed tomography
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:03:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c821e7f3a76941cb9dc7441a096d132e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-031X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:03:18Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
spelling doaj.art-c821e7f3a76941cb9dc7441a096d132e2022-12-22T00:42:07ZengElsevierJournal of Orthopaedic Translation2214-031X2019-07-01185964Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly menXiao-ming Xu0Na Li1Kai Li2Xiao-Yu Li3Ping Zhang4Yan-jiao Xuan5Xiao-guang Cheng6Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31 Xinjiekoudongjie Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31 Xinjiekoudongjie Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31 Xinjiekoudongjie Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, ChinaDepartment of Geriatric, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, ChinaDepartment of Geriatric, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31 Xinjiekoudongjie Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31 Xinjiekoudongjie Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, China; Corresponding author.Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic discordance of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Chinese elderly men. Methods: A total of 313 males older than 60 years, who underwent both spinal QCT and lumbar spine and hip DXA in our department, were included. The diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organisation in 1994 were used for DXA to diagnose osteoporosis, and the criteria recommended by the International Society of Clinical Densitometry were used for QCT. The osteoporosis detection rate by the two techniques was calculated, and the difference was compared. The minor discordance was considered present when the different diagnostic classes between the two techniques were adjacent. Major discordance was present when the diagnosis by one technique was osteoporosis and the other was normal. The computed tomography images were reviewed by radiologists to assess whether vertebral fracture, aorta calcification or degeneration was present. Results: In the 313 participants (mean age, 79.6 ± 7.2 years), the osteoporosis detection rate was 10.9% for DXA (lumbar spine and hip) and 45.1% for QCT, a significant difference (p < 0.001). The major discordance, minor discordance and concordance of diagnosis between the two techniques were seen in 8.3%, 50.8% and 40.9%, respectively. QCT detected osteoporosis better than DXA. The causes of this discordance were degeneration of spine, abdominal aorta calcification and vertebral fractures. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that discordance was common when using QCT and DXA to diagnose osteoporosis and that spinal degeneration, aorta calcification and fracture obscure the bone mineral density measurement of spine by DXA. QCT is a more sensitive method of choice to identify osteoporosis in elderly Chinese men. The translational potential of this article: This study investigated the diagnostic discordance of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Chinese elderly men. The results demonstrated that QCT is a more sensitive method of choice to identify osteoporosis in elderly Chinese men. This work may help clinicians make an appropriate choice of technique for the accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis and identify the patients at high risk of osteoporosis who should be treated early to prevent fractures. This may influence the therapeutic plan and the overall prognosis of patients. Keywords: Bone mineral density, Dual X-ray absorptiometry, Osteoporosis, Quantitative computed tomographyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X18300925
spellingShingle Xiao-ming Xu
Na Li
Kai Li
Xiao-Yu Li
Ping Zhang
Yan-jiao Xuan
Xiao-guang Cheng
Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
title Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men
title_full Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men
title_fullStr Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men
title_full_unstemmed Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men
title_short Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men
title_sort discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual energy x ray absorptiometry in chinese elderly men
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X18300925
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaomingxu discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen
AT nali discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen
AT kaili discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen
AT xiaoyuli discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen
AT pingzhang discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen
AT yanjiaoxuan discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen
AT xiaoguangcheng discordanceindiagnosisofosteoporosisbyquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualenergyxrayabsorptiometryinchineseelderlymen