The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome

Background: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the two methods of delivery, "hands-on" vs. "hands poised", on perineal trauma and delivery outcome in primiparous women referred to Shariati Hospital of Isfahan during 2007-2008. Methods: In a clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azam Foroughipour, Farah Firuzeh, Ataolah Ghahiri, Vajihe Norbakhsh, Tayebeh Heidari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2011;volume=16;issue=8;spage=1040;epage=1046;aulast=Foroughipour
_version_ 1819229147416756224
author Azam Foroughipour
Farah Firuzeh
Ataolah Ghahiri
Vajihe Norbakhsh
Tayebeh Heidari
author_facet Azam Foroughipour
Farah Firuzeh
Ataolah Ghahiri
Vajihe Norbakhsh
Tayebeh Heidari
author_sort Azam Foroughipour
collection DOAJ
description Background: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the two methods of delivery, "hands-on" vs. "hands poised", on perineal trauma and delivery outcome in primiparous women referred to Shariati Hospital of Isfahan during 2007-2008. Methods: In a clinical trial study, 100 low risk primiparous pregnant women were randomly assigned to two hands-on and hand-poised (hands-off) groups. In the hands-on group, this method was used to control fetal head in the second stage of labor. It means that the fingers of one hand supported fetal occiput and the other hand applied slight pressure on the head to control the delivery of the head during the crowning process. In the hands-poised group, midwife observed the parturient woman and do not touch perineum during the second labor stage while fetal head was delivering. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of perineal trauma, as well as neonatal and delivery outcome. Results: Demographic characteristics of all studied women were similar in two groups. The rate of episiotomy was higher in hands-on group (84% vs. 40%, p = 0.001). The rate of postpartum hemorrhage (4 th stage) was higher in hands-on group (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.04). The rate of mild and moderate postpartum pain in hands-on group was higher than hands-off group (70% vs. 58% and 29% vs. 10%, p < 0.001) but sever pain was not different in two groups. Conclusions: It seems that hands-poised method is associated with less perineal trauma, particularly regarding the lower need for episiotomy and postpartum hemorrhage.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T11:08:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c83b22615ffe4579993716a41f57aabe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T11:08:33Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-c83b22615ffe4579993716a41f57aabe2022-12-21T17:49:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362011-01-0116810401046The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcomeAzam ForoughipourFarah FiruzehAtaolah GhahiriVajihe NorbakhshTayebeh HeidariBackground: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the two methods of delivery, "hands-on" vs. "hands poised", on perineal trauma and delivery outcome in primiparous women referred to Shariati Hospital of Isfahan during 2007-2008. Methods: In a clinical trial study, 100 low risk primiparous pregnant women were randomly assigned to two hands-on and hand-poised (hands-off) groups. In the hands-on group, this method was used to control fetal head in the second stage of labor. It means that the fingers of one hand supported fetal occiput and the other hand applied slight pressure on the head to control the delivery of the head during the crowning process. In the hands-poised group, midwife observed the parturient woman and do not touch perineum during the second labor stage while fetal head was delivering. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of perineal trauma, as well as neonatal and delivery outcome. Results: Demographic characteristics of all studied women were similar in two groups. The rate of episiotomy was higher in hands-on group (84% vs. 40%, p = 0.001). The rate of postpartum hemorrhage (4 th stage) was higher in hands-on group (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.04). The rate of mild and moderate postpartum pain in hands-on group was higher than hands-off group (70% vs. 58% and 29% vs. 10%, p < 0.001) but sever pain was not different in two groups. Conclusions: It seems that hands-poised method is associated with less perineal trauma, particularly regarding the lower need for episiotomy and postpartum hemorrhage.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2011;volume=16;issue=8;spage=1040;epage=1046;aulast=ForoughipourHand-poised MethodHands-on MethodPerineal TraumaDelivery Outcome
spellingShingle Azam Foroughipour
Farah Firuzeh
Ataolah Ghahiri
Vajihe Norbakhsh
Tayebeh Heidari
The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Hand-poised Method
Hands-on Method
Perineal Trauma
Delivery Outcome
title The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
title_full The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
title_fullStr The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
title_full_unstemmed The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
title_short The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
title_sort effect of perineal control with hands on and hand poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome
topic Hand-poised Method
Hands-on Method
Perineal Trauma
Delivery Outcome
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2011;volume=16;issue=8;spage=1040;epage=1046;aulast=Foroughipour
work_keys_str_mv AT azamforoughipour theeffectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT farahfiruzeh theeffectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT ataolahghahiri theeffectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT vajihenorbakhsh theeffectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT tayebehheidari theeffectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT azamforoughipour effectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT farahfiruzeh effectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT ataolahghahiri effectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT vajihenorbakhsh effectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome
AT tayebehheidari effectofperinealcontrolwithhandsonandhandpoisedmethodsonperinealtraumaanddeliveryoutcome