Response suppression delays the planning of subsequent stimulus-driven saccades.
The completion of an antisaccade selectively increases the reaction tiME (RT) of a subsequent prosaccade: a result that has been interpreted to reflect the residual inhibition of stimulus-driven saccade networks [1], [2]. In the present investigation we sought to determine whether the increase in pr...
Main Authors: | Jeffrey Weiler, Trina Mitchell, Matthew Heath |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466076/pdf/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
A unified comparison of stimulus-driven, endogenous mandatory and 'free choice' saccades.
by: Andrei Gorea, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Detection of stimulus displacements across saccades is capacity-limited and biased in favor of the saccade target
by: David E. Irwin, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01) -
Fixation-related saccadic inhibition in free viewing in response to stimulus saliency
by: Oren Kadosh, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Response suppression produces a switch-cost for spatially compatible saccades
by: Tari, B, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Binocular onset rivalry at the time of saccades and stimulus jumps.
by: Joke P Kalisvaart, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)