https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9

Henry Rousso warned that the engagement of historians as expert witnesses in trials, particularly highly politicized proceedings of mass crimes, risks a judicialization of history. This article tests Rousso’s argument through analysis of three quite different case studies: the Frankfurt Auschwitz tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Gidley, Mathew Turner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Association of Genocide Scholars 2018-12-01
Series:Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
_version_ 1818138913310507008
author Rebecca Gidley
Mathew Turner
author_facet Rebecca Gidley
Mathew Turner
author_sort Rebecca Gidley
collection DOAJ
description Henry Rousso warned that the engagement of historians as expert witnesses in trials, particularly highly politicized proceedings of mass crimes, risks a judicialization of history. This article tests Rousso’s argument through analysis of three quite different case studies: the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial; the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia; and the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh. It argues that Rousso’s objections misrepresent the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, while failing to account for the engagement of historical expertise in mass atrocity trials beyond Europe. Paradoxically, Rousso’s criticisms are less suited to the European context that represents his purview, and apply more readily to the highly-politicized crimes tribunals outside the continent. Finally, it contends that the importance of the proceedings themselves should be measured in full against the hypothetically corrupting effects of historians’ engagement as experts in court
first_indexed 2024-12-11T10:19:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c84e421885fd45b1af839b792480b13e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1911-0359
1911-9933
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T10:19:45Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher International Association of Genocide Scholars
record_format Article
series Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
spelling doaj.art-c84e421885fd45b1af839b792480b13e2022-12-22T01:11:29ZengInternational Association of Genocide ScholarsGenocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal1911-03591911-99332018-12-01123526710.5038/1911-9933.12.3.1566https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9Rebecca Gidley0Mathew Turner1Australian National UniversityDeakin UniversityHenry Rousso warned that the engagement of historians as expert witnesses in trials, particularly highly politicized proceedings of mass crimes, risks a judicialization of history. This article tests Rousso’s argument through analysis of three quite different case studies: the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial; the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia; and the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh. It argues that Rousso’s objections misrepresent the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, while failing to account for the engagement of historical expertise in mass atrocity trials beyond Europe. Paradoxically, Rousso’s criticisms are less suited to the European context that represents his purview, and apply more readily to the highly-politicized crimes tribunals outside the continent. Finally, it contends that the importance of the proceedings themselves should be measured in full against the hypothetically corrupting effects of historians’ engagement as experts in courthttps://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9historianstrialsexpert witnessesFrankfurt Auschwitz trialGermanyExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of CambodiaInternational Crimes TribunalBangladesh
spellingShingle Rebecca Gidley
Mathew Turner
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
historians
trials
expert witnesses
Frankfurt Auschwitz trial
Germany
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
International Crimes Tribunal
Bangladesh
title https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
title_full https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
title_fullStr https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
title_full_unstemmed https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
title_short https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
title_sort https scholarcommons usf edu gsp vol12 iss3 9
topic historians
trials
expert witnesses
Frankfurt Auschwitz trial
Germany
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
International Crimes Tribunal
Bangladesh
url https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol12/iss3/9
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccagidley httpsscholarcommonsusfedugspvol12iss39
AT mathewturner httpsscholarcommonsusfedugspvol12iss39