Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality

This paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several of the same biases of risky decision making also apply to choices about distrib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zachary Michaelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2015-03-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000396X/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797701691839086592
author Zachary Michaelson
author_facet Zachary Michaelson
author_sort Zachary Michaelson
collection DOAJ
description This paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several of the same biases of risky decision making also apply to choices about distributional fairness, in particular focusing on the key biases that lead to prospect theory. This finding is achieved by introducing a novel thought experiment regarding the fairness of resource distributions, then manipulating the percentage of individuals who gain or lose in these distributions, and changing the sizes of gains and losses. Shared biases may mean similar heuristics are being employed. The mechanism behind this result leaves room for future exploration, as do the implications of the finding for related applications in inequality research.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:40:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8579755886f49cd93f210410e52dc5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:40:25Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-c8579755886f49cd93f210410e52dc5c2023-09-03T09:45:53ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752015-03-011019820310.1017/S193029750000396XBiases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequalityZachary Michaelson0Finance Department, New York UniversityThis paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several of the same biases of risky decision making also apply to choices about distributional fairness, in particular focusing on the key biases that lead to prospect theory. This finding is achieved by introducing a novel thought experiment regarding the fairness of resource distributions, then manipulating the percentage of individuals who gain or lose in these distributions, and changing the sizes of gains and losses. Shared biases may mean similar heuristics are being employed. The mechanism behind this result leaves room for future exploration, as do the implications of the finding for related applications in inequality research.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000396X/type/journal_articledistributional fairnessAllais paradoxisolation effectcertainty effectpeanuts effectinequalityreflection effectprospect theory
spellingShingle Zachary Michaelson
Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
Judgment and Decision Making
distributional fairness
Allais paradox
isolation effect
certainty effect
peanuts effect
inequality
reflection effect
prospect theory
title Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
title_full Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
title_fullStr Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
title_full_unstemmed Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
title_short Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
title_sort biases in choices about fairness psychology and economic inequality
topic distributional fairness
Allais paradox
isolation effect
certainty effect
peanuts effect
inequality
reflection effect
prospect theory
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000396X/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharymichaelson biasesinchoicesaboutfairnesspsychologyandeconomicinequality