Consecuencias de las interpretaciones actuales de la metafísica humeana en el debate sobre las leyes de na naturaleza
A highly influential position in the debate between nomological realists and antirealists (i.e., the debate about the metaphysical status of natural laws) is the regularist theory of laws. Its main feature is the defense of a humean metaphysics which denies the existence of real causal powers and ne...
Main Authors: | Bruno Borge, Roberto Azar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/41001 |
Similar Items
-
Hume's Correlationism: On Meillassoux, Necessity and Belief
by: Paul O'Mahoney
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Tri interpretácie Humovej teórie príčinnosti a problém falošných príčin (Three Interpretations of Hume’s Theory of Causation and the Problem of Spurious Causes)
by: Tomáš Károly
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Russell e a Noção de Causa
by: Sílvio Seno Chibeni
Published: (2001-12-01) -
Can Realism Be Naturalized?
by: Christopher Norris
Published: (2000-06-01) -
As crenças naturais e a mitigação do ceticismo em Hume
by: André Luiz Olivier da Silva
Published: (2010-06-01)