Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS

Abstract This study aimed to predict the drying kinetics, energy utilization (Eu), energy utilization ratio (EUR), exergy loss, and exergy efficiency of quince slice in a hot air (HA) dryer using artificial neural networks and ANFIS. The experiments were performed at air temperatures of 50, 60, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yousef Abbaspour‐Gilandeh, Ahmad Jahanbakhshi, Mohammad Kaveh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Food Science & Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1347
_version_ 1797221378477260800
author Yousef Abbaspour‐Gilandeh
Ahmad Jahanbakhshi
Mohammad Kaveh
author_facet Yousef Abbaspour‐Gilandeh
Ahmad Jahanbakhshi
Mohammad Kaveh
author_sort Yousef Abbaspour‐Gilandeh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study aimed to predict the drying kinetics, energy utilization (Eu), energy utilization ratio (EUR), exergy loss, and exergy efficiency of quince slice in a hot air (HA) dryer using artificial neural networks and ANFIS. The experiments were performed at air temperatures of 50, 60, and 70°C and air velocities of 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 m/s. The thermal parameters were determined using thermodynamic relations. Increasing air temperature and air velocity increased the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff), Eu, EUR, exergy efficiency, and exergy loss. The value of the Deff was varied from 4.19 × 10–10 to 1.18 × 10–9 m2/s. The highest value Eu, EUR, and exergy loss and exergy efficiency were calculated 0.0694 kJ/s, 0.882, 0.044 kJ/s, and 0.879, respectively. Midilli et al. model, ANNs, and ANFIS model, with a determination coefficient (R2) of .9992, .9993, and .9997, provided the best performance for predicting the moisture ratio of quince fruit. Also, the ANFIS model, in comparison with the artificial neural networks model, was better able to predict Eu, EUR, exergy efficiency, and exergy loss, with R2 of .9989, .9988, .9986, and .9978, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:04:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c87169011d6a4ca48b96a4cc87cfbdea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-7177
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:04:29Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Food Science & Nutrition
spelling doaj.art-c87169011d6a4ca48b96a4cc87cfbdea2024-04-05T09:16:03ZengWileyFood Science & Nutrition2048-71772020-01-018159461110.1002/fsn3.1347Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFISYousef Abbaspour‐Gilandeh0Ahmad Jahanbakhshi1Mohammad Kaveh2Department of Biosystems Engineering College of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Mohaghegh Ardabili Ardabil IranDepartment of Biosystems Engineering College of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Mohaghegh Ardabili Ardabil IranDepartment of Biosystems Engineering College of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Mohaghegh Ardabili Ardabil IranAbstract This study aimed to predict the drying kinetics, energy utilization (Eu), energy utilization ratio (EUR), exergy loss, and exergy efficiency of quince slice in a hot air (HA) dryer using artificial neural networks and ANFIS. The experiments were performed at air temperatures of 50, 60, and 70°C and air velocities of 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 m/s. The thermal parameters were determined using thermodynamic relations. Increasing air temperature and air velocity increased the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff), Eu, EUR, exergy efficiency, and exergy loss. The value of the Deff was varied from 4.19 × 10–10 to 1.18 × 10–9 m2/s. The highest value Eu, EUR, and exergy loss and exergy efficiency were calculated 0.0694 kJ/s, 0.882, 0.044 kJ/s, and 0.879, respectively. Midilli et al. model, ANNs, and ANFIS model, with a determination coefficient (R2) of .9992, .9993, and .9997, provided the best performance for predicting the moisture ratio of quince fruit. Also, the ANFIS model, in comparison with the artificial neural networks model, was better able to predict Eu, EUR, exergy efficiency, and exergy loss, with R2 of .9989, .9988, .9986, and .9978, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1347adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference systemartificial neural networksdryingquincethermodynamic parameters
spellingShingle Yousef Abbaspour‐Gilandeh
Ahmad Jahanbakhshi
Mohammad Kaveh
Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS
Food Science & Nutrition
adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system
artificial neural networks
drying
quince
thermodynamic parameters
title Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS
title_full Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS
title_fullStr Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS
title_full_unstemmed Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS
title_short Prediction kinetic, energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using ANNs and ANFIS
title_sort prediction kinetic energy and exergy of quince under hot air dryer using anns and anfis
topic adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system
artificial neural networks
drying
quince
thermodynamic parameters
url https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1347
work_keys_str_mv AT yousefabbaspourgilandeh predictionkineticenergyandexergyofquinceunderhotairdryerusingannsandanfis
AT ahmadjahanbakhshi predictionkineticenergyandexergyofquinceunderhotairdryerusingannsandanfis
AT mohammadkaveh predictionkineticenergyandexergyofquinceunderhotairdryerusingannsandanfis