Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada
Flaws in Canada’s military procurement processes are a perennial burden on both government and industry. The release of the Defence Procurement Strategy this year signified Ottawa’s inclination toward change. Among other things, the DPS promises to consult industry and outside experts earlier, crea...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Calgary
2015-04-01
|
| Series: | The School of Public Policy Publications |
| Online Access: | https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42515 |
| _version_ | 1827877189363695616 |
|---|---|
| author | J. Craig Stone |
| author_facet | J. Craig Stone |
| author_sort | J. Craig Stone |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Flaws in Canada’s military procurement processes are a perennial burden on both government and industry. The release of the Defence Procurement Strategy this year signified Ottawa’s inclination toward change. Among other things, the DPS promises to consult industry and outside experts earlier, create a specialist acquisition branch within Public Works & Government Services Canada and use military equipment projects to generate domestic jobs and growth. The DPS is a good start, but more focused solutions are required. The defence market has too few buyers and sellers to be truly competitive — especially in Canada. Government must share information with industry at every step, clearly and comprehensively, if Canadian firms are to win contracts fairly, keeping the economic benefits at home. A sweeping, end-to-end review of procurement is also required to identify current practices that work and others in need of improvement. Preliminary cost estimates can’t be too firm because prices shift as projects develop, and all too often, capabilities are downgraded in response. Government has to be transparent about how far into the future lifecycle costs run, or stop trying to establish them altogether, so as to avoid the consequences of embarrassingly unrealistic assessments. A separate procurement organization should also be established outside of the DND and PWGSC to make better use of the people with the skills to run complex military procurement projects. Canada’s military procurement system is not as broken as its most strident critics allege, but it is coming under increasing fiscal and policy pressures. This brief fleshes out the issues that would-be reformers should take into account and surveys procedures among allied nations to offer a roadmap for change. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:32:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c874957bc1584fc8a1dcf63ae7268534 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2560-8312 2560-8320 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:32:57Z |
| publishDate | 2015-04-01 |
| publisher | University of Calgary |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The School of Public Policy Publications |
| spelling | doaj.art-c874957bc1584fc8a1dcf63ae72685342023-08-04T15:52:33ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202015-04-018Improving the Acquisition Process in CanadaJ. Craig Stone0Canadian Forces College Flaws in Canada’s military procurement processes are a perennial burden on both government and industry. The release of the Defence Procurement Strategy this year signified Ottawa’s inclination toward change. Among other things, the DPS promises to consult industry and outside experts earlier, create a specialist acquisition branch within Public Works & Government Services Canada and use military equipment projects to generate domestic jobs and growth. The DPS is a good start, but more focused solutions are required. The defence market has too few buyers and sellers to be truly competitive — especially in Canada. Government must share information with industry at every step, clearly and comprehensively, if Canadian firms are to win contracts fairly, keeping the economic benefits at home. A sweeping, end-to-end review of procurement is also required to identify current practices that work and others in need of improvement. Preliminary cost estimates can’t be too firm because prices shift as projects develop, and all too often, capabilities are downgraded in response. Government has to be transparent about how far into the future lifecycle costs run, or stop trying to establish them altogether, so as to avoid the consequences of embarrassingly unrealistic assessments. A separate procurement organization should also be established outside of the DND and PWGSC to make better use of the people with the skills to run complex military procurement projects. Canada’s military procurement system is not as broken as its most strident critics allege, but it is coming under increasing fiscal and policy pressures. This brief fleshes out the issues that would-be reformers should take into account and surveys procedures among allied nations to offer a roadmap for change.https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42515 |
| spellingShingle | J. Craig Stone Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada The School of Public Policy Publications |
| title | Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada |
| title_full | Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada |
| title_fullStr | Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada |
| title_full_unstemmed | Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada |
| title_short | Improving the Acquisition Process in Canada |
| title_sort | improving the acquisition process in canada |
| url | https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42515 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jcraigstone improvingtheacquisitionprocessincanada |