The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses
Starting from an analysis of the scientific and political uses of the concept of informal care, this paper raises questions and launches the debate on the causes and effects of its uses. Recognizing the diversity and the contradictions found across the use of the term, it explains how its predominan...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Sociology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1195790/full |
| _version_ | 1797777741002571776 |
|---|---|
| author | Sofia Alexandra Cruz José Soeiro Sara Canha Valentina Perrotta |
| author_facet | Sofia Alexandra Cruz José Soeiro Sara Canha Valentina Perrotta |
| author_sort | Sofia Alexandra Cruz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Starting from an analysis of the scientific and political uses of the concept of informal care, this paper raises questions and launches the debate on the causes and effects of its uses. Recognizing the diversity and the contradictions found across the use of the term, it explains how its predominant use in Europe can be problematic. First, although it is widely recognized that care is provided primarily by women, this gender dimension is not emphasized in a concept that obscures the sexual division. Second, it does not render explicit that informal care is work, despite being unpaid. Third, the allusion to informality is likely to generate confusion with informal employment of care workers. Finally, studies often focus exclusively on care provided by family members, without distinguishing the spaces in which the work takes place and the social relationships it involves, namely the family or community. In Europe, where documents from (non)governmental organizations focus mainly on long-term care related to demographic aging, it is the care crisis of formal care provision systems, faced with financial fragility, reduction in funds and insufficient supply to meet the demand, that brings informal care to the political and scientific agendas. This paper argues that it is necessary to define conceptual boundaries that allow international studies on the dimension and value of this care work to be compared. It also advocates the importance of making visible that this is work, unpaid and female-dominated, since this view supports action guidelines more focused on social transformation and empowerment. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:09:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c87a0ef65af144d4b2e0c58dff6fbfad |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2297-7775 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:09:00Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Sociology |
| spelling | doaj.art-c87a0ef65af144d4b2e0c58dff6fbfad2023-07-18T10:00:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sociology2297-77752023-07-01810.3389/fsoc.2023.11957901195790The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political usesSofia Alexandra Cruz0José Soeiro1Sara Canha2Valentina Perrotta3Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, Porto, PortugalFaculty of Arts, Institute of Sociology, University of Porto, Porto, PortugalCentre for Research in Anthropology (CRIA), University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE), Lisbon, PortugalFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Republic of Uruguay, Montevideo, UruguayStarting from an analysis of the scientific and political uses of the concept of informal care, this paper raises questions and launches the debate on the causes and effects of its uses. Recognizing the diversity and the contradictions found across the use of the term, it explains how its predominant use in Europe can be problematic. First, although it is widely recognized that care is provided primarily by women, this gender dimension is not emphasized in a concept that obscures the sexual division. Second, it does not render explicit that informal care is work, despite being unpaid. Third, the allusion to informality is likely to generate confusion with informal employment of care workers. Finally, studies often focus exclusively on care provided by family members, without distinguishing the spaces in which the work takes place and the social relationships it involves, namely the family or community. In Europe, where documents from (non)governmental organizations focus mainly on long-term care related to demographic aging, it is the care crisis of formal care provision systems, faced with financial fragility, reduction in funds and insufficient supply to meet the demand, that brings informal care to the political and scientific agendas. This paper argues that it is necessary to define conceptual boundaries that allow international studies on the dimension and value of this care work to be compared. It also advocates the importance of making visible that this is work, unpaid and female-dominated, since this view supports action guidelines more focused on social transformation and empowerment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1195790/fullinformal careunpaid carescientific usespolitical usespublic policiesgender inequality |
| spellingShingle | Sofia Alexandra Cruz José Soeiro Sara Canha Valentina Perrotta The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses Frontiers in Sociology informal care unpaid care scientific uses political uses public policies gender inequality |
| title | The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses |
| title_full | The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses |
| title_fullStr | The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses |
| title_full_unstemmed | The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses |
| title_short | The concept of informal care: ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses |
| title_sort | concept of informal care ambiguities and controversies on its scientific and political uses |
| topic | informal care unpaid care scientific uses political uses public policies gender inequality |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1195790/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sofiaalexandracruz theconceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT josesoeiro theconceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT saracanha theconceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT valentinaperrotta theconceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT sofiaalexandracruz conceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT josesoeiro conceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT saracanha conceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses AT valentinaperrotta conceptofinformalcareambiguitiesandcontroversiesonitsscientificandpoliticaluses |