Evidence-Based Software Engineering: A Checklist-Based Approach to Assess the Abstracts of Reviews Self-Identifying as Systematic Reviews
A systematic review allows synthesizing the state of knowledge related to a clearly formulated research question as well as understanding the correlations between exposures and outcomes. A systematic review usually leverages explicit, reproducible, and systematic methods that allow reducing the pote...
Main Authors: | Alvine Boaye Belle, Yixi Zhao |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/18/9017 |
Similar Items
-
How to write a scoping review?
by: Pooja Sharma, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Gender as performance, experience, identity and, variable: A systematic review of gender research in jazz and improvisation
by: Nicole Canham, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Reporting completeness in abstracts of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in cardiovascular diseases is suboptimal
by: Eirini Pagkalidou, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Study title: A systematic review of RCTs to examine the risk of adverse cardiovascular events with nicotine use
by: Mimi M. Kim, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Getting ahead of the pandemic curve: A systematic review of critical determining factors for innovation adoption in ensuring food security
by: Ammar Redza Ahmad Rizal, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)