Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundMeropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific time intervals. However, the continuous infusion approach ensures sustained drug exposure, maintaining the drug concentrati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming-Ying Ai, Wei-Lun Chang, Chia-Ying Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337570/full
_version_ 1827323268140367872
author Ming-Ying Ai
Wei-Lun Chang
Chia-Ying Liu
author_facet Ming-Ying Ai
Wei-Lun Chang
Chia-Ying Liu
author_sort Ming-Ying Ai
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMeropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific time intervals. However, the continuous infusion approach ensures sustained drug exposure, maintaining the drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the entire treatment period. This study aimed to find out the association between continuous infusions of meropenem and mortality rates.Materials and methodsWe conducted a search of the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to 14 August 2023. The six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included in our analysis. The random-effects model was implemented using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to examine the outcomes.ResultsOur study included a total of 1,529 adult patients from six randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome indicated that continuous infusion of meropenem did not lead to reduction in the mortality rate (odds ratio = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.671–1.061, P =0.147). Secondary outcomes revealed no significant differences in ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU mortality, clinical cure, or adverse events between continuous infusion and traditional intermittent bolus strategies of meropenem. Notably, we observed significant improvements in bacterial eradication (odds ratio 19 = 2.207, 95% CI: 1.467–3.320, P < 0.001) with continuous infusion of meropenem. Our study also suggested that performing continuous infusion may lead to better bacterial eradication effects in resistant pathogens (coefficient: 2.5175, P = 0.0138*).ConclusionContinuous infusion of meropenem did not result in the reduction of mortality rates but showed potential in improving bacterial eradication. Furthermore, this strategy may be particularly beneficial for achieving better bacterial eradication, especially in cases involving resistant pathogens.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:42:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8824889d2034a318c774a4f5c36a444
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:42:30Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-c8824889d2034a318c774a4f5c36a4442024-03-08T04:45:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2024-03-011510.3389/fmicb.2024.13375701337570Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsMing-Ying Ai0Wei-Lun Chang1Chia-Ying Liu2Department of Pharmacy, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, TaiwanDepartment of Pharmacy, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, TaiwanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, TaiwanBackgroundMeropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific time intervals. However, the continuous infusion approach ensures sustained drug exposure, maintaining the drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the entire treatment period. This study aimed to find out the association between continuous infusions of meropenem and mortality rates.Materials and methodsWe conducted a search of the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to 14 August 2023. The six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included in our analysis. The random-effects model was implemented using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to examine the outcomes.ResultsOur study included a total of 1,529 adult patients from six randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome indicated that continuous infusion of meropenem did not lead to reduction in the mortality rate (odds ratio = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.671–1.061, P =0.147). Secondary outcomes revealed no significant differences in ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU mortality, clinical cure, or adverse events between continuous infusion and traditional intermittent bolus strategies of meropenem. Notably, we observed significant improvements in bacterial eradication (odds ratio 19 = 2.207, 95% CI: 1.467–3.320, P < 0.001) with continuous infusion of meropenem. Our study also suggested that performing continuous infusion may lead to better bacterial eradication effects in resistant pathogens (coefficient: 2.5175, P = 0.0138*).ConclusionContinuous infusion of meropenem did not result in the reduction of mortality rates but showed potential in improving bacterial eradication. Furthermore, this strategy may be particularly beneficial for achieving better bacterial eradication, especially in cases involving resistant pathogens.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337570/fullcontinuous infusionmeropenemmortalityresistant pathogensbacterial eradication
spellingShingle Ming-Ying Ai
Wei-Lun Chang
Chia-Ying Liu
Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Frontiers in Microbiology
continuous infusion
meropenem
mortality
resistant pathogens
bacterial eradication
title Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic continuous infusion
meropenem
mortality
resistant pathogens
bacterial eradication
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337570/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mingyingai mortalityofcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusofmeropenemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT weilunchang mortalityofcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusofmeropenemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chiayingliu mortalityofcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusofmeropenemasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials