Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization

Within this single-center cohort study, we investigated the impact of optimal medical therapy on all-cause mortality, major amputation-free survival and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD TLR) in 552 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing endovascular infrapopl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Wittig, Toni Pflug, Andrej Schmidt, Dierk Scheinert, Sabine Steiner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/15/5146
_version_ 1797586551880810496
author Tim Wittig
Toni Pflug
Andrej Schmidt
Dierk Scheinert
Sabine Steiner
author_facet Tim Wittig
Toni Pflug
Andrej Schmidt
Dierk Scheinert
Sabine Steiner
author_sort Tim Wittig
collection DOAJ
description Within this single-center cohort study, we investigated the impact of optimal medical therapy on all-cause mortality, major amputation-free survival and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD TLR) in 552 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization. From the overall cohort, 145 patients were treated for intermittent claudication (IC) and 407 were treated for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as the presence of at least one antiplatelet agent, statin and ACE inhibitor or AT-2 antagonist based on guideline recommendations. About half (55.5%) of all patients were prescribed OMT at discharge, with a higher proportion in claudicants (62.1%) versus CLI patients (53.2%). Over three years of follow-up, survival was significantly better in patients with IC (80.6 ± 3.8% vs. 59.9 ± 2.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a signal towards better survival in those patients receiving OMT (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.09). Similarly, amputation-free survival (AFS) was significantly better in patients with IC (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and also in patients receiving OMT (78.8 ± 3.6%) compared to that in those without OMT (71.5 ± 4.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.046). Freedom from CD TLR within three years was significantly better in the IC group (<i>p</i> = 0.002), but there were no statistically significant differences for CD TLR dependent on the presence of OMT (<i>p</i> = 0.79). In conclusion, there is still an important underuse of OMT in patients undergoing infrapopliteal interventions, which is even more pronounced in CLI despite a signal for its benefit regarding all-cause mortality and major amputation-free survival.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:23:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c884fd0ee56b4917b8a7e11c048d3878
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:23:49Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-c884fd0ee56b4917b8a7e11c048d38782023-11-18T23:09:59ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-08-011215514610.3390/jcm12155146Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal RevascularizationTim Wittig0Toni Pflug1Andrej Schmidt2Dierk Scheinert3Sabine Steiner4Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Sana Klinikum Borna, 04552 Borna, GermanyDepartment of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, GermanyWithin this single-center cohort study, we investigated the impact of optimal medical therapy on all-cause mortality, major amputation-free survival and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD TLR) in 552 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization. From the overall cohort, 145 patients were treated for intermittent claudication (IC) and 407 were treated for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as the presence of at least one antiplatelet agent, statin and ACE inhibitor or AT-2 antagonist based on guideline recommendations. About half (55.5%) of all patients were prescribed OMT at discharge, with a higher proportion in claudicants (62.1%) versus CLI patients (53.2%). Over three years of follow-up, survival was significantly better in patients with IC (80.6 ± 3.8% vs. 59.9 ± 2.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a signal towards better survival in those patients receiving OMT (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.09). Similarly, amputation-free survival (AFS) was significantly better in patients with IC (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and also in patients receiving OMT (78.8 ± 3.6%) compared to that in those without OMT (71.5 ± 4.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.046). Freedom from CD TLR within three years was significantly better in the IC group (<i>p</i> = 0.002), but there were no statistically significant differences for CD TLR dependent on the presence of OMT (<i>p</i> = 0.79). In conclusion, there is still an important underuse of OMT in patients undergoing infrapopliteal interventions, which is even more pronounced in CLI despite a signal for its benefit regarding all-cause mortality and major amputation-free survival.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/15/5146peripheral arterial diseasechronic limb-threatening ischemialimb salvagemajor amputationpharmacotherapy
spellingShingle Tim Wittig
Toni Pflug
Andrej Schmidt
Dierk Scheinert
Sabine Steiner
Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization
Journal of Clinical Medicine
peripheral arterial disease
chronic limb-threatening ischemia
limb salvage
major amputation
pharmacotherapy
title Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization
title_full Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization
title_fullStr Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization
title_short Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization
title_sort impact of optimal medical therapy on reintervention and survival rates after endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization
topic peripheral arterial disease
chronic limb-threatening ischemia
limb salvage
major amputation
pharmacotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/15/5146
work_keys_str_mv AT timwittig impactofoptimalmedicaltherapyonreinterventionandsurvivalratesafterendovascularinfrapoplitealrevascularization
AT tonipflug impactofoptimalmedicaltherapyonreinterventionandsurvivalratesafterendovascularinfrapoplitealrevascularization
AT andrejschmidt impactofoptimalmedicaltherapyonreinterventionandsurvivalratesafterendovascularinfrapoplitealrevascularization
AT dierkscheinert impactofoptimalmedicaltherapyonreinterventionandsurvivalratesafterendovascularinfrapoplitealrevascularization
AT sabinesteiner impactofoptimalmedicaltherapyonreinterventionandsurvivalratesafterendovascularinfrapoplitealrevascularization