Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter

Formal decision-analytic methods can be used to frame disease control problems, the first step of which is to define a clear and specific objective. We demonstrate the imperative of framing clearly-defined management objectives in finding optimal control actions for control of disease outbreaks. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William J.M. Probert, Katriona Shea, Christopher J. Fonnesbeck, Michael C. Runge, Tim E. Carpenter, Salome Dürr, M. Graeme Garner, Neil Harvey, Mark A. Stevenson, Colleen T. Webb, Marleen Werkman, Michael J. Tildesley, Matthew J. Ferrari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-06-01
Series:Epidemics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175543651500095X
_version_ 1811267156734640128
author William J.M. Probert
Katriona Shea
Christopher J. Fonnesbeck
Michael C. Runge
Tim E. Carpenter
Salome Dürr
M. Graeme Garner
Neil Harvey
Mark A. Stevenson
Colleen T. Webb
Marleen Werkman
Michael J. Tildesley
Matthew J. Ferrari
author_facet William J.M. Probert
Katriona Shea
Christopher J. Fonnesbeck
Michael C. Runge
Tim E. Carpenter
Salome Dürr
M. Graeme Garner
Neil Harvey
Mark A. Stevenson
Colleen T. Webb
Marleen Werkman
Michael J. Tildesley
Matthew J. Ferrari
author_sort William J.M. Probert
collection DOAJ
description Formal decision-analytic methods can be used to frame disease control problems, the first step of which is to define a clear and specific objective. We demonstrate the imperative of framing clearly-defined management objectives in finding optimal control actions for control of disease outbreaks. We illustrate an analysis that can be applied rapidly at the start of an outbreak when there are multiple stakeholders involved with potentially multiple objectives, and when there are also multiple disease models upon which to compare control actions. The output of our analysis frames subsequent discourse between policy-makers, modellers and other stakeholders, by highlighting areas of discord among different management objectives and also among different models used in the analysis. We illustrate this approach in the context of a hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in Cumbria, UK using outputs from five rigorously-studied simulation models of FMD spread. We present both relative rankings and relative performance of controls within each model and across a range of objectives. Results illustrate how control actions change across both the base metric used to measure management success and across the statistic used to rank control actions according to said metric. This work represents a first step towards reconciling the extensive modelling work on disease control problems with frameworks for structured decision making.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:57:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c89bb7b633eb4048bfcd66e00293ba68
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1755-4365
1878-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:57:20Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Epidemics
spelling doaj.art-c89bb7b633eb4048bfcd66e00293ba682022-12-22T03:16:58ZengElsevierEpidemics1755-43651878-00672016-06-0115C101910.1016/j.epidem.2015.11.002Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matterWilliam J.M. Probert0Katriona Shea1Christopher J. Fonnesbeck2Michael C. Runge3Tim E. Carpenter4Salome Dürr5M. Graeme Garner6Neil Harvey7Mark A. Stevenson8Colleen T. Webb9Marleen Werkman10Michael J. Tildesley11Matthew J. Ferrari12Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Eberly College of Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Eberly College of Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesUS Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest Rd, Laurel, MD, United StatesEpiCentre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandVeterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandAnimal Health Policy Branch, Australian Government, Department of Agriculture, GPO Box 858, Canberra 2601, ACT, AustraliaDepartment of Computing and Information Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United StatesCentral Veterinary Institute, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The NetherlandsSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, United KingdomCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Eberly College of Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesFormal decision-analytic methods can be used to frame disease control problems, the first step of which is to define a clear and specific objective. We demonstrate the imperative of framing clearly-defined management objectives in finding optimal control actions for control of disease outbreaks. We illustrate an analysis that can be applied rapidly at the start of an outbreak when there are multiple stakeholders involved with potentially multiple objectives, and when there are also multiple disease models upon which to compare control actions. The output of our analysis frames subsequent discourse between policy-makers, modellers and other stakeholders, by highlighting areas of discord among different management objectives and also among different models used in the analysis. We illustrate this approach in the context of a hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in Cumbria, UK using outputs from five rigorously-studied simulation models of FMD spread. We present both relative rankings and relative performance of controls within each model and across a range of objectives. Results illustrate how control actions change across both the base metric used to measure management success and across the statistic used to rank control actions according to said metric. This work represents a first step towards reconciling the extensive modelling work on disease control problems with frameworks for structured decision making.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175543651500095XEpidemiologyManagementDecision makingOptimisationObjectivesFoot-and-mouth disease
spellingShingle William J.M. Probert
Katriona Shea
Christopher J. Fonnesbeck
Michael C. Runge
Tim E. Carpenter
Salome Dürr
M. Graeme Garner
Neil Harvey
Mark A. Stevenson
Colleen T. Webb
Marleen Werkman
Michael J. Tildesley
Matthew J. Ferrari
Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter
Epidemics
Epidemiology
Management
Decision making
Optimisation
Objectives
Foot-and-mouth disease
title Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter
title_full Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter
title_fullStr Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter
title_short Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter
title_sort decision making for foot and mouth disease control objectives matter
topic Epidemiology
Management
Decision making
Optimisation
Objectives
Foot-and-mouth disease
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175543651500095X
work_keys_str_mv AT williamjmprobert decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT katrionashea decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT christopherjfonnesbeck decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT michaelcrunge decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT timecarpenter decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT salomedurr decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT mgraemegarner decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT neilharvey decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT markastevenson decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT colleentwebb decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT marleenwerkman decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT michaeljtildesley decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter
AT matthewjferrari decisionmakingforfootandmouthdiseasecontrolobjectivesmatter