Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking

Smoking is a leading cause of morbidity and premature death constituting a global health challenge. Although, pharmacological and behavioral approaches comprise the mainstay of smoking cessation interventions, the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy is not demonstrated for some populations. Non-p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Pandria, A. Athanasiou, L. Konstantara, M. Karagianni, P.D. Bamidis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:NeuroImage: Clinical
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220302345
_version_ 1819070564926488576
author N. Pandria
A. Athanasiou
L. Konstantara
M. Karagianni
P.D. Bamidis
author_facet N. Pandria
A. Athanasiou
L. Konstantara
M. Karagianni
P.D. Bamidis
author_sort N. Pandria
collection DOAJ
description Smoking is a leading cause of morbidity and premature death constituting a global health challenge. Although, pharmacological and behavioral approaches comprise the mainstay of smoking cessation interventions, the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy is not demonstrated for some populations. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as biofeedback (BF) and neurofeedback (NF) could facilitate self-regulation of predisposing factors of relapse such as craving and stress. The current review aims to aggregate the existing evidence regarding the effects of BF and NF training on smokers. Relevant studies were identified through searching in Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library, and through hand-searching the references of screened articles. Peer-reviewed controlled and uncontrolled studies, where BF and/or NF training was administered, were included and evaluated according to PICOS framework. Narrative qualitative synthesis of ten eligible studies was performed, aggregated into three categories according to training provided. BF outcomes seem to be affected by smoking behavior prior to training; individualized EEG NF training holds promise for modulating craving-related response while minimizing the required number of sessions. Real-time fMRI NF studies concluded that nicotine-dependent individuals could modulate craving-related brain responses, while mixed results were revealed regarding smokers’ ability to modulate brain responses related to resistance towards the urge to smoke. BF and NF training seem to facilitate modulation of autonomous and/or central nervous system activity while also transferring this learned self-regulation to behavioral outcomes. BF and NF training should a) address remaining issues on specificity and scientific validity, b) target diverse demographics, and c) produce robust reproducible methodologies and clinical guidelines for relevant health care providers, in order to be considered as viable complementary tools to standard smoking cessation care.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T17:07:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8a74cbee9074ccf8bcacf8c5a28b89b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2213-1582
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T17:07:57Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage: Clinical
spelling doaj.art-c8a74cbee9074ccf8bcacf8c5a28b89b2022-12-21T18:56:29ZengElsevierNeuroImage: Clinical2213-15822020-01-0128102397Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smokingN. Pandria0A. Athanasiou1L. Konstantara2M. Karagianni3P.D. Bamidis4Lab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece; Northern Greece Neurofeedback Center, Thessaloniki, GreeceLab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, GreeceLab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, GreeceLab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, GreeceLab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece; Corresponding author.Smoking is a leading cause of morbidity and premature death constituting a global health challenge. Although, pharmacological and behavioral approaches comprise the mainstay of smoking cessation interventions, the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy is not demonstrated for some populations. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as biofeedback (BF) and neurofeedback (NF) could facilitate self-regulation of predisposing factors of relapse such as craving and stress. The current review aims to aggregate the existing evidence regarding the effects of BF and NF training on smokers. Relevant studies were identified through searching in Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library, and through hand-searching the references of screened articles. Peer-reviewed controlled and uncontrolled studies, where BF and/or NF training was administered, were included and evaluated according to PICOS framework. Narrative qualitative synthesis of ten eligible studies was performed, aggregated into three categories according to training provided. BF outcomes seem to be affected by smoking behavior prior to training; individualized EEG NF training holds promise for modulating craving-related response while minimizing the required number of sessions. Real-time fMRI NF studies concluded that nicotine-dependent individuals could modulate craving-related brain responses, while mixed results were revealed regarding smokers’ ability to modulate brain responses related to resistance towards the urge to smoke. BF and NF training seem to facilitate modulation of autonomous and/or central nervous system activity while also transferring this learned self-regulation to behavioral outcomes. BF and NF training should a) address remaining issues on specificity and scientific validity, b) target diverse demographics, and c) produce robust reproducible methodologies and clinical guidelines for relevant health care providers, in order to be considered as viable complementary tools to standard smoking cessation care.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220302345BiofeedbackNeurofeedbackElectroencephalogramSystematic reviewReal-time functional magnetic resonance imagingSmoking
spellingShingle N. Pandria
A. Athanasiou
L. Konstantara
M. Karagianni
P.D. Bamidis
Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
NeuroImage: Clinical
Biofeedback
Neurofeedback
Electroencephalogram
Systematic review
Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging
Smoking
title Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
title_full Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
title_fullStr Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
title_full_unstemmed Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
title_short Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
title_sort advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking
topic Biofeedback
Neurofeedback
Electroencephalogram
Systematic review
Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging
Smoking
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220302345
work_keys_str_mv AT npandria advancesinbiofeedbackandneurofeedbackstudiesonsmoking
AT aathanasiou advancesinbiofeedbackandneurofeedbackstudiesonsmoking
AT lkonstantara advancesinbiofeedbackandneurofeedbackstudiesonsmoking
AT mkaragianni advancesinbiofeedbackandneurofeedbackstudiesonsmoking
AT pdbamidis advancesinbiofeedbackandneurofeedbackstudiesonsmoking