Co‐occurrence models fail to infer underlying patterns of avoidance and aggregation when closure is violated
Abstract Advances in multi‐species monitoring have prompted an increase in the use of multi‐species occupancy analyses to assess patterns of co‐occurrence among species, even when data were collected at scales likely violating the assumption that sites were closed to changes in the occupancy state f...
Main Author: | Robert C. Lonsinger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9104 |
Similar Items
-
Spatial scale matters when modeling avian co‐occurrence
by: Tyler M. Harms, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Combined effects of habitat and interspecific interaction define co-occurrence patterns of sympatric Galliformes
by: Lijun Chen, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Changes in ecological conditions may influence intraguild competition: inferring interaction patterns of snow leopard with co-predators
by: Ranjana Pal, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Context‐dependency in carnivore co‐occurrence across a multi‐use conservation landscape
by: Gonçalo Curveira‐Santos, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Co-migration fidelity at a stopover site increases over time in African–European migratory landbirds
by: Bruno Bellisario, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)