Footnotes to Kraepelin: Changes in the classification of mood disorders with DSM-5

Reliable diagnosis of mood disorders continues to pose a challenge. This is surprising because they have been recognised clinically since classical times. Mood disorders are also common: major depressive disorder affects nearly 300 million people worldwide and bipolar affective disorder nearly 60 mi...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
主要な著者: Nicola J. Kalk, Allan H. Young
フォーマット: 論文
言語:English
出版事項: Cambridge University Press 2017-05-01
シリーズ:BJPsych Open
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472400002180/type/journal_article
その他の書誌記述
要約:Reliable diagnosis of mood disorders continues to pose a challenge. This is surprising because they have been recognised clinically since classical times. Mood disorders are also common: major depressive disorder affects nearly 300 million people worldwide and bipolar affective disorder nearly 60 million and they are a major cause of disability. Nonetheless, the reliability trials of the updated Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) found that the reliability of the diagnosis of major depressive disorder was in the 'questionable' range. Although the reliability of the diagnosis of bipolar I disorder in the same trials was 'good', the sample size of the individuals recruited to validate bipolar II disorder was insufficient to confirm reliability. As the epidemiological prevalences of bipolar I and bipolar II disorders are the same, this alone implies problems in its recognition. Here, we critically evaluate the most recent iteration of DSM mood disorder diagnoses in a historical light and set out the implications for clinical practice and research.
ISSN:2056-4724