Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Abstract Background Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence. The purpose of this article is to clearly describe th...
Main Authors: | Zachary Munn, Micah D. J. Peters, Cindy Stern, Catalin Tufanaru, Alexa McArthur, Edoardo Aromataris |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x |
Similar Items
-
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
by: Zachary Munn, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
How to write a scoping review?
by: Pooja Sharma, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
How to write a scoping review? – A comprehensive guide
by: Alpa Gupta, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
by: Alex Pollock, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Benchmarking veterinary librarians’ participation in systematic reviews and scoping reviews
by: Lorraine Toews
Published: (2019-10-01)