Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations

Estimates of the uncertainties arising from approximations in the methods used in different nuclear data processing and neutron transport codes are usually obtained by inter-comparing calculations made using different code systems. This paper gives details of an investigation of differences between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milošević Miodrag 1, Greenspan Ehud, Vujić Jasmina Lj.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences 2003-01-01
Series:Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2003/1451-39940302003M.pdf
_version_ 1819140166210551808
author Milošević Miodrag 1
Greenspan Ehud
Vujić Jasmina Lj.
author_facet Milošević Miodrag 1
Greenspan Ehud
Vujić Jasmina Lj.
author_sort Milošević Miodrag 1
collection DOAJ
description Estimates of the uncertainties arising from approximations in the methods used in different nuclear data processing and neutron transport codes are usually obtained by inter-comparing calculations made using different code systems. This paper gives details of an investigation of differences between results obtained by using different codes for a single zone model of the Encapsulated Nuclear Heat Source (ENHS) benchmark core fuelled with metallic alloy of Pu, U, and Zr. The ENHS is a new lead-bismuth or lead cooled novel reactor concept for 20 effective full power years without refuelling and with very small reactivity swing. The computational tools benchmarked include MOCUP, a coupled MCNP-4C and ORIGEN2.1 utility codes with MCNP data libraries based on ENDF/B-VI evaluation; KENO-V.a/ORIGEN2.1 code system, recently developed by authors of this paper, with the ENDFB-V based 238 group library; the design-oriented procedure based on the simplified one-dimensional (1D) geometry model and SAS2H control module; and the well-established fast reactor neutronics design tools in use at Argonne National Laboratory. Calculations made for the ENHS benchmark have shown that the differences between the results obtained when using different code schemes are quite significant and should be taken into account in assessing the quality of the nuclear data library.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T11:34:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8bab03b9ecd4f80b7a35776d4713138
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1451-3994
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T11:34:14Z
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
record_format Article
series Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
spelling doaj.art-c8bab03b9ecd4f80b7a35776d47131382022-12-21T18:27:29ZengVINCA Institute of Nuclear SciencesNuclear Technology and Radiation Protection1451-39942003-01-0118231110.2298/NTRP0302003MMonte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculationsMilošević Miodrag 1Greenspan EhudVujić Jasmina Lj.Estimates of the uncertainties arising from approximations in the methods used in different nuclear data processing and neutron transport codes are usually obtained by inter-comparing calculations made using different code systems. This paper gives details of an investigation of differences between results obtained by using different codes for a single zone model of the Encapsulated Nuclear Heat Source (ENHS) benchmark core fuelled with metallic alloy of Pu, U, and Zr. The ENHS is a new lead-bismuth or lead cooled novel reactor concept for 20 effective full power years without refuelling and with very small reactivity swing. The computational tools benchmarked include MOCUP, a coupled MCNP-4C and ORIGEN2.1 utility codes with MCNP data libraries based on ENDF/B-VI evaluation; KENO-V.a/ORIGEN2.1 code system, recently developed by authors of this paper, with the ENDFB-V based 238 group library; the design-oriented procedure based on the simplified one-dimensional (1D) geometry model and SAS2H control module; and the well-established fast reactor neutronics design tools in use at Argonne National Laboratory. Calculations made for the ENHS benchmark have shown that the differences between the results obtained when using different code schemes are quite significant and should be taken into account in assessing the quality of the nuclear data library.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2003/1451-39940302003M.pdfMonte Carlofuel burnupORIGEN2.1ENHS benchmark
spellingShingle Milošević Miodrag 1
Greenspan Ehud
Vujić Jasmina Lj.
Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations
Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
Monte Carlo
fuel burnup
ORIGEN2.1
ENHS benchmark
title Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations
title_full Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations
title_fullStr Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations
title_full_unstemmed Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations
title_short Monte Carlo with fuel burnup method for the ENHS benchmark calculations
title_sort monte carlo with fuel burnup method for the enhs benchmark calculations
topic Monte Carlo
fuel burnup
ORIGEN2.1
ENHS benchmark
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2003/1451-39940302003M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT milosevicmiodrag1 montecarlowithfuelburnupmethodfortheenhsbenchmarkcalculations
AT greenspanehud montecarlowithfuelburnupmethodfortheenhsbenchmarkcalculations
AT vujicjasminalj montecarlowithfuelburnupmethodfortheenhsbenchmarkcalculations