Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series

Background: Hand knob infarction is a well-known stroke entity. Based on very limited data, embolic stroke mechanism has been considered the most frequent cause; however, prognosis is considered good. We wanted to shed more light on this phenomenon by assessing a cohort of patients referred to a gen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karl B. Alstadhaug, Ane Sjulstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2013-04-01
Series:Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/350708
_version_ 1818806480951836672
author Karl B. Alstadhaug
Ane Sjulstad
author_facet Karl B. Alstadhaug
Ane Sjulstad
author_sort Karl B. Alstadhaug
collection DOAJ
description Background: Hand knob infarction is a well-known stroke entity. Based on very limited data, embolic stroke mechanism has been considered the most frequent cause; however, prognosis is considered good. We wanted to shed more light on this phenomenon by assessing a cohort of patients referred to a general hospital stroke unit. Methods: Every subject admitted to our stroke unit with an acute isolated hand paresis in the period from 2007 to 2012 was identified prospectively. Patients who had suffered from a stroke in the hand motor cortex or an adjacent area explaining the acute loss of hand function were included in the study. The Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria were used to classify subtypes of stroke according to etiology. The patients were followed up during autumn 2012. Results: Seventeen subjects were admitted, but in 2 of them symptoms were transitory and magnetic resonance imaging was negative. Two patients were excluded due to persisting sensory deficits. The remaining 13 (11 males and 2 females) patients with an average age of 62.9 (±13.4) years were included, representing 1.5% of all ischemic strokes diagnosed at the stroke unit in the given period. All patients were right-handed, and the dominant hand was affected only in 4 (31%). The average Medical Research Council's scale score was 3.1 (±1.4) on admission, and classified as bad. On follow-up, which occurred on average 29.8 (±19.8) months after the stroke, the score was 4.6 (±0.4) and was classified as fair to good. No patient experienced a new stroke. The outcome was good to excellent in 10 patients (77%). Two patients died (15%), 1 of probable cardiac arrest and 1 of unknown cause. One patient did not participate in the follow-up. The majority of patients had evidence of both small artery (77%) and large artery (85%) disease. On average, there were 1.6 (±0.4) new ischemic lesions per patient. Six patients had a solitary lesion (46%). In 5 of them, small artery occlusion was considered the probable stroke mechanism. In 4 cases, the stroke was of undetermined etiology. Three patients had atrial fibrillation, and in 2 of them cardioembolism was the probable stroke mechanism. Two patients with definite large artery atherosclerosis underwent carotid endarterectomy, and 1 of them had comorbid atrial fibrillation. Conclusion: Strokes causing isolated hand paresis seem to have a heterogeneous etiology. Prognosis regarding hand function is good, but long-term outcome depends on stroke etiology and secondary prophylaxis.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T19:10:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8cbc2ff44f54a48a3d3c7dab387e37d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-5456
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T19:10:27Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher Karger Publishers
record_format Article
series Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
spelling doaj.art-c8cbc2ff44f54a48a3d3c7dab387e37d2022-12-21T20:56:18ZengKarger PublishersCerebrovascular Diseases Extra1664-54562013-04-0131657310.1159/000350708350708Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case SeriesKarl B. AlstadhaugAne SjulstadBackground: Hand knob infarction is a well-known stroke entity. Based on very limited data, embolic stroke mechanism has been considered the most frequent cause; however, prognosis is considered good. We wanted to shed more light on this phenomenon by assessing a cohort of patients referred to a general hospital stroke unit. Methods: Every subject admitted to our stroke unit with an acute isolated hand paresis in the period from 2007 to 2012 was identified prospectively. Patients who had suffered from a stroke in the hand motor cortex or an adjacent area explaining the acute loss of hand function were included in the study. The Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria were used to classify subtypes of stroke according to etiology. The patients were followed up during autumn 2012. Results: Seventeen subjects were admitted, but in 2 of them symptoms were transitory and magnetic resonance imaging was negative. Two patients were excluded due to persisting sensory deficits. The remaining 13 (11 males and 2 females) patients with an average age of 62.9 (±13.4) years were included, representing 1.5% of all ischemic strokes diagnosed at the stroke unit in the given period. All patients were right-handed, and the dominant hand was affected only in 4 (31%). The average Medical Research Council's scale score was 3.1 (±1.4) on admission, and classified as bad. On follow-up, which occurred on average 29.8 (±19.8) months after the stroke, the score was 4.6 (±0.4) and was classified as fair to good. No patient experienced a new stroke. The outcome was good to excellent in 10 patients (77%). Two patients died (15%), 1 of probable cardiac arrest and 1 of unknown cause. One patient did not participate in the follow-up. The majority of patients had evidence of both small artery (77%) and large artery (85%) disease. On average, there were 1.6 (±0.4) new ischemic lesions per patient. Six patients had a solitary lesion (46%). In 5 of them, small artery occlusion was considered the probable stroke mechanism. In 4 cases, the stroke was of undetermined etiology. Three patients had atrial fibrillation, and in 2 of them cardioembolism was the probable stroke mechanism. Two patients with definite large artery atherosclerosis underwent carotid endarterectomy, and 1 of them had comorbid atrial fibrillation. Conclusion: Strokes causing isolated hand paresis seem to have a heterogeneous etiology. Prognosis regarding hand function is good, but long-term outcome depends on stroke etiology and secondary prophylaxis.http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/350708StrokeStroke mechanismCortical handHand knobMonoparesisHand motor cortex
spellingShingle Karl B. Alstadhaug
Ane Sjulstad
Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Stroke
Stroke mechanism
Cortical hand
Hand knob
Monoparesis
Hand motor cortex
title Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series
title_full Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series
title_fullStr Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series
title_short Isolated Hand Paresis: A Case Series
title_sort isolated hand paresis a case series
topic Stroke
Stroke mechanism
Cortical hand
Hand knob
Monoparesis
Hand motor cortex
url http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/350708
work_keys_str_mv AT karlbalstadhaug isolatedhandparesisacaseseries
AT anesjulstad isolatedhandparesisacaseseries