Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie M. Eick, Dana E. Goin, Juleen Lam, Tracey J. Woodruff, Nicholas Chartres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8
_version_ 1828785457605902336
author Stephanie M. Eick
Dana E. Goin
Juleen Lam
Tracey J. Woodruff
Nicholas Chartres
author_facet Stephanie M. Eick
Dana E. Goin
Juleen Lam
Tracey J. Woodruff
Nicholas Chartres
author_sort Stephanie M. Eick
collection DOAJ
first_indexed 2024-12-11T23:52:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8cf4aad68994608a6473dde458e28a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T23:52:43Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-c8cf4aad68994608a6473dde458e28a32022-12-22T00:45:27ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532022-05-011111210.1186/s13643-022-01967-8Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”Stephanie M. Eick0Dana E. Goin1Juleen Lam2Tracey J. Woodruff3Nicholas Chartres4Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory UniversityProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Franciscohttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8
spellingShingle Stephanie M. Eick
Dana E. Goin
Juleen Lam
Tracey J. Woodruff
Nicholas Chartres
Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
Systematic Reviews
title Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_full Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_fullStr Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_full_unstemmed Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_short Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
title_sort correction authors rebuttal to integrated risk information system iris response to assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools different conclusions from different tools
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniemeick correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT danaegoin correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT juleenlam correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT traceyjwoodruff correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools
AT nicholaschartres correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools