Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8 |
_version_ | 1828785457605902336 |
---|---|
author | Stephanie M. Eick Dana E. Goin Juleen Lam Tracey J. Woodruff Nicholas Chartres |
author_facet | Stephanie M. Eick Dana E. Goin Juleen Lam Tracey J. Woodruff Nicholas Chartres |
author_sort | Stephanie M. Eick |
collection | DOAJ |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:52:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c8cf4aad68994608a6473dde458e28a3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2046-4053 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:52:43Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Systematic Reviews |
spelling | doaj.art-c8cf4aad68994608a6473dde458e28a32022-12-22T00:45:27ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532022-05-011111210.1186/s13643-022-01967-8Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”Stephanie M. Eick0Dana E. Goin1Juleen Lam2Tracey J. Woodruff3Nicholas Chartres4Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory UniversityProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Franciscohttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8 |
spellingShingle | Stephanie M. Eick Dana E. Goin Juleen Lam Tracey J. Woodruff Nicholas Chartres Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” Systematic Reviews |
title | Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” |
title_full | Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” |
title_fullStr | Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” |
title_full_unstemmed | Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” |
title_short | Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools” |
title_sort | correction authors rebuttal to integrated risk information system iris response to assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools different conclusions from different tools |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephaniemeick correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools AT danaegoin correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools AT juleenlam correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools AT traceyjwoodruff correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools AT nicholaschartres correctionauthorsrebuttaltointegratedriskinformationsystemirisresponsetoassessingriskofbiasinhumanenvironmentalepidemiologystudiesusingthreetoolsdifferentconclusionsfromdifferenttools |