Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”

Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Stephanie M. Eick, Dana E. Goin, Juleen Lam, Tracey J. Woodruff, Nicholas Chartres
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMC 2022-05-01
Series:	Systematic Reviews
Online Access:	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01967-8

Similar Items

Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools
by: Stephanie M. Eick, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures
by: Lisa Bero, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

A REBUTTAL
by: Ebers, G
Published: (1982)

NEW JOURNAL REBUTTAL
by: Caplin, A, et al.
Published: (1977)

Rebuttal to "Merge Is Not 'Lerge'"
by: Jeffrey Watumull, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Rebuttal From Dr Pavord
by: Pavord, I
Published: (2018)

Altman on Triffin. A rebuttal
by: R. TRIFFIN
Published: (2014-03-01)

Development and evaluation of a novel dietary bisphenol A (BPA) exposure risk tool
by: Jennifer C. Hartle, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Author rebuttal to response regarding “Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Could pulmonary arterial hypertension patients be at lower risk from severe COVID-19?’”
by: Evelyn Horn, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Rebuttal from Drs Corcoran and Rahman.
by: Corcoran, J, et al.
Published: (2014)

Combating rumors on the internet : the use of rebuttals
by: Pal, Anjan
Published: (2021)

An investigation into rebuttals in debate types and strategies /
by: 221852 Farizal Mohd. Razalli
Published: (2002)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
by: Higgins, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
by: Higgins, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

An investigation into rebuttals in debate : types and strategies [microfilm] /
by: Farizal Mohd. Razalli
Published: (2002)

Rebuttal from Rachna Begh and Paul Aveyard
by: Begh, R, et al.
Published: (2020)

Opposition to Pharmacist Contraception Services: Evidence for Rebuttal
by: Madeline Mitchell, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Inter-rater reliability of risk of bias tools for non-randomized studies
by: Isabel Kalaycioglu, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Review and Metanalysis of the Gut Microbiome
by: Thomas Lampeter, et al.

No evidence that age affects different bilingual learner groups differently: Rebuttal to van der Slik, Schepens, Bongaerts, and van Hout (2021)
by: Joshua Hartshorne
Published: (2024-11-01)

Risk Navigator SRM: An Applied Risk Management Tool
by: Dana L. K. Hoag, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

How do users respond to online rumor rebuttals?
by: Pal, Anjan, et al.
Published: (2022)

Rebuttal from malcolm kohler and john R. Stradling.
by: Kohler, M, et al.
Published: (2012)

Rebuttal from Malcolm Kohler and John R. Stradling
by: Kohler, M, et al.
Published: (2012)

Rebuttal to the Arguments in the Letter to the Editor: Improvement May be Possible
by: Gaanty Pragas, Maniam, et al.
Published: (2012)

A rebuttal of recent arguments for Maragha influence on Copernicus
by: Viktor Blåsjö
Published: (2018-12-01)

Functional Epistemology “Nullifies” Dyson’s Rebuttal of Perturbation Theory
by: Karl Svozil
Published: (2023-01-01)

A rebuttal of recent arguments for Maragha influence on Copernicus
by: Viktor Blåsjö
Published: (2018-12-01)

Deadly Radon in Montana? A Rebuttal to Dr. Larsson
by: John Hart
Published: (2011-04-01)

The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality
by: Vincent Berthet, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
by: Wolff, RF, et al.
Published: (2019)

MEL-IRIS: An Online Tool for Audio Analysis and Music Indexing
by: Dimitrios Margounakis, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Impact of state anxiety on the jumping to conclusions delusion bias.
by: So, S, et al.
Published: (2008)

One simulation, different conclusions—the baseline period makes the difference!
by: S Liersch, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

The alleged ' Nanking Massacre' : Japan's rebuttal to China's forged claims /
by: 353829 Takemoto, Tadao, et al.
Published: (2000)

Response to Coimbra (2023) ‘Rebuttal of Leite and Do Carmo, 2021’
by: AMANDA M. LEITE, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

A rebuttal to the comments on the genome order index and the <it>Z</it>-curve
by: Zhang Ren
Published: (2011-02-01)

Application of probabilistic methods to address variability and uncertainty in estimating risks for non-cancer health effects
by: Greylin H. Nielsen, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
by: Hernan, Miguel Angel
Published: (2017)

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
by: Sterne, JAC, et al.
Published: (2019)