GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We introduce <it>GASH</it>, a new, publicly accessible program for structural alignment and superposition. Alignments are scored by the Number of Equivalent Residues (NER), a quantitative measure of structural similarity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toh Hiroyuki, Standley Daron M, Nakamura Haruki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-09-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/221
_version_ 1818386282036854784
author Toh Hiroyuki
Standley Daron M
Nakamura Haruki
author_facet Toh Hiroyuki
Standley Daron M
Nakamura Haruki
author_sort Toh Hiroyuki
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We introduce <it>GASH</it>, a new, publicly accessible program for structural alignment and superposition. Alignments are scored by the Number of Equivalent Residues (NER), a quantitative measure of structural similarity that can be applied to any structural alignment method. Multiple alignments are optimized by conjugate gradient maximization of the NER score within the genetic algorithm framework. Initial alignments are generated by the program Local ASH, and can be supplemented by alignments from any other program.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We compare GASH to DaliLite, CE, and to our earlier program Global ASH on a difficult test set consisting of 3,102 structure pairs, as well as a smaller set derived from the Fischer-Eisenberg set. The extent of alignment crossover, as well as the completeness of the initial set of alignments are examined. The quality of the superpositions is evaluated both by NER and by the number of aligned residues under three different RMSD cutoffs (2,4, and 6Å). In addition to the numerical assessment, the alignments for several biologically related structural pairs are discussed in detail.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Regardless of which criteria is used to judge the superposition accuracy, GASH achieves the best overall performance, followed by DaliLite, Global ASH, and CE. In terms of CPU usage, DaliLite CE and GASH perform similarly for query proteins under 500 residues, but for larger proteins DaliLite is faster than GASH or CE. Both an http interface and a simple object application protocol (SOAP) interface to the GASH program are available at <url>http://www.pdbj.org/GASH/</url>.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T03:51:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8cfa211898b454f91178ca97c543192
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2105
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T03:51:34Z
publishDate 2005-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Bioinformatics
spelling doaj.art-c8cfa211898b454f91178ca97c5431922022-12-21T23:18:12ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052005-09-016122110.1186/1471-2105-6-221GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structuresToh HiroyukiStandley Daron MNakamura Haruki<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We introduce <it>GASH</it>, a new, publicly accessible program for structural alignment and superposition. Alignments are scored by the Number of Equivalent Residues (NER), a quantitative measure of structural similarity that can be applied to any structural alignment method. Multiple alignments are optimized by conjugate gradient maximization of the NER score within the genetic algorithm framework. Initial alignments are generated by the program Local ASH, and can be supplemented by alignments from any other program.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We compare GASH to DaliLite, CE, and to our earlier program Global ASH on a difficult test set consisting of 3,102 structure pairs, as well as a smaller set derived from the Fischer-Eisenberg set. The extent of alignment crossover, as well as the completeness of the initial set of alignments are examined. The quality of the superpositions is evaluated both by NER and by the number of aligned residues under three different RMSD cutoffs (2,4, and 6Å). In addition to the numerical assessment, the alignments for several biologically related structural pairs are discussed in detail.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Regardless of which criteria is used to judge the superposition accuracy, GASH achieves the best overall performance, followed by DaliLite, Global ASH, and CE. In terms of CPU usage, DaliLite CE and GASH perform similarly for query proteins under 500 residues, but for larger proteins DaliLite is faster than GASH or CE. Both an http interface and a simple object application protocol (SOAP) interface to the GASH program are available at <url>http://www.pdbj.org/GASH/</url>.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/221
spellingShingle Toh Hiroyuki
Standley Daron M
Nakamura Haruki
GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
BMC Bioinformatics
title GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
title_full GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
title_fullStr GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
title_full_unstemmed GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
title_short GASH: An improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
title_sort gash an improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/221
work_keys_str_mv AT tohhiroyuki gashanimprovedalgorithmformaximizingthenumberofequivalentresiduesbetweentwoproteinstructures
AT standleydaronm gashanimprovedalgorithmformaximizingthenumberofequivalentresiduesbetweentwoproteinstructures
AT nakamuraharuki gashanimprovedalgorithmformaximizingthenumberofequivalentresiduesbetweentwoproteinstructures