The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then poin...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/55225 |
_version_ | 1818527719763214336 |
---|---|
author | Alex Silva Gonçalves Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino |
author_facet | Alex Silva Gonçalves Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino |
author_sort | Alex Silva Gonçalves |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T06:39:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c8dd688f3bb44beb8ad5d4e45c35ea09 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0101-9562 2177-7055 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T06:39:57Z |
publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
record_format | Article |
series | Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos |
spelling | doaj.art-c8dd688f3bb44beb8ad5d4e45c35ea092022-12-22T01:17:16ZdeuUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaSequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos0101-95622177-70552018-06-0139789111810.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p9129141The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal systemAlex Silva Gonçalves0Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino1Faculdade Paraíso do CearáFaculdade Paraíso do CearáThe validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart).https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/55225Teoria do DireitoNorma Hipotética FundamentalRegra de Reconhecimento |
spellingShingle | Alex Silva Gonçalves Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos Teoria do Direito Norma Hipotética Fundamental Regra de Reconhecimento |
title | The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_full | The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_fullStr | The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_full_unstemmed | The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_short | The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_sort | hans kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the herbert hart recognition rule similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
topic | Teoria do Direito Norma Hipotética Fundamental Regra de Reconhecimento |
url | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/55225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexsilvagoncalves thehanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem AT regiohermiltonribeiroquirino thehanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem AT alexsilvagoncalves hanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem AT regiohermiltonribeiroquirino hanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem |