The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system

The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then poin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Silva Gonçalves, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2018-06-01
Series:Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/55225
_version_ 1818527719763214336
author Alex Silva Gonçalves
Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino
author_facet Alex Silva Gonçalves
Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino
author_sort Alex Silva Gonçalves
collection DOAJ
description The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart).
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:39:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8dd688f3bb44beb8ad5d4e45c35ea09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0101-9562
2177-7055
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:39:57Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
record_format Article
series Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos
spelling doaj.art-c8dd688f3bb44beb8ad5d4e45c35ea092022-12-22T01:17:16ZdeuUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaSequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos0101-95622177-70552018-06-0139789111810.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p9129141The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal systemAlex Silva Gonçalves0Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino1Faculdade Paraíso do CearáFaculdade Paraíso do CearáThe validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart).https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/55225Teoria do DireitoNorma Hipotética FundamentalRegra de Reconhecimento
spellingShingle Alex Silva Gonçalves
Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos
Teoria do Direito
Norma Hipotética Fundamental
Regra de Reconhecimento
title The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
title_full The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
title_fullStr The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
title_full_unstemmed The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
title_short The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
title_sort hans kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the herbert hart recognition rule similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
topic Teoria do Direito
Norma Hipotética Fundamental
Regra de Reconhecimento
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/55225
work_keys_str_mv AT alexsilvagoncalves thehanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem
AT regiohermiltonribeiroquirino thehanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem
AT alexsilvagoncalves hanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem
AT regiohermiltonribeiroquirino hanskelsenfundamentalhypotheticalstandardandtheherberthartrecognitionrulesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthevaliditycriteriaofthelegalsystem