Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques, such as robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR), have potential benefits for patients in various clinical scenarios. However, the value of RIHR in older age groups has not yet been established, as increased age may place patients at a higher risk of postopera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar Yusef Kudsi, Fahri Gokcal, Naseem Bou-Ayash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2021;volume=4;issue=1;spage=7;epage=12;aulast=Kudsi
_version_ 1798033803709513728
author Omar Yusef Kudsi
Fahri Gokcal
Naseem Bou-Ayash
author_facet Omar Yusef Kudsi
Fahri Gokcal
Naseem Bou-Ayash
author_sort Omar Yusef Kudsi
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques, such as robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR), have potential benefits for patients in various clinical scenarios. However, the value of RIHR in older age groups has not yet been established, as increased age may place patients at a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of RIHR in patients ≥80 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among patients who underwent RIHR between February 2013 and August 2020, patients ≥80 years old were included. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were reviewed. Postoperative complications were assessed according to the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) scoring system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the risk factors for patients with complications. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included in the study. The average operative time was 58.7 min. The average length of stay was 0.5 days. Urinary retention and seroma were the commonly encountered complications (CD Grades 1 and 2). A procedural intervention and overnight intensive care unit follow-up were needed in two patients for each (CD Grade-3a and-4a). The maximum morbidity CCI score was 43.3. There was no hernia recurrence or reoperation during the mean follow-up period of 42 months. No statistically significant difference was found between patients with and without complications. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of RIHR in patients ≥ 80-year-old. Although advanced age is associated with increased comorbidities and physiological irregularities, RIHR may be performed with short operative time, length of hospital stay, and low rate of postoperative complications in these patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:35:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8e4d690c4ab4e64a08622acd4df7fad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-8736
2589-8078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:35:31Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
spelling doaj.art-c8e4d690c4ab4e64a08622acd4df7fad2022-12-22T04:04:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery2589-87362589-80782021-01-014171210.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_38_20Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and olderOmar Yusef KudsiFahri GokcalNaseem Bou-AyashBACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques, such as robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR), have potential benefits for patients in various clinical scenarios. However, the value of RIHR in older age groups has not yet been established, as increased age may place patients at a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of RIHR in patients ≥80 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among patients who underwent RIHR between February 2013 and August 2020, patients ≥80 years old were included. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were reviewed. Postoperative complications were assessed according to the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) scoring system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the risk factors for patients with complications. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included in the study. The average operative time was 58.7 min. The average length of stay was 0.5 days. Urinary retention and seroma were the commonly encountered complications (CD Grades 1 and 2). A procedural intervention and overnight intensive care unit follow-up were needed in two patients for each (CD Grade-3a and-4a). The maximum morbidity CCI score was 43.3. There was no hernia recurrence or reoperation during the mean follow-up period of 42 months. No statistically significant difference was found between patients with and without complications. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of RIHR in patients ≥ 80-year-old. Although advanced age is associated with increased comorbidities and physiological irregularities, RIHR may be performed with short operative time, length of hospital stay, and low rate of postoperative complications in these patients.http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2021;volume=4;issue=1;spage=7;epage=12;aulast=Kudsielderlygroin herniainguinal herniaoctogenarianoldest oldrobotics
spellingShingle Omar Yusef Kudsi
Fahri Gokcal
Naseem Bou-Ayash
Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
elderly
groin hernia
inguinal hernia
octogenarian
oldest old
robotics
title Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
title_full Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
title_fullStr Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
title_full_unstemmed Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
title_short Robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
title_sort robotic inguinal hernia repair in patients aged eighty and older
topic elderly
groin hernia
inguinal hernia
octogenarian
oldest old
robotics
url http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2021;volume=4;issue=1;spage=7;epage=12;aulast=Kudsi
work_keys_str_mv AT omaryusefkudsi roboticinguinalherniarepairinpatientsagedeightyandolder
AT fahrigokcal roboticinguinalherniarepairinpatientsagedeightyandolder
AT naseembouayash roboticinguinalherniarepairinpatientsagedeightyandolder