Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome

Better results have been recently reported in clinical pancreatic islet transplantation (ITX) due mostly to improved isolation techniques and immunosuppression; however, some limitations still exist. It is known that following transplantation, 30% to 60% of the islets are lost. In our study, we have...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daria Zorzi, Tammy Phan, Marco Sequi, Yong Lin, Daniel H. Freeman, Luca Cicalese, Cristiana Rastellini M.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Cell Transplantation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3727/096368913X673469
_version_ 1818342348398002176
author Daria Zorzi
Tammy Phan
Marco Sequi
Yong Lin
Daniel H. Freeman
Luca Cicalese
Cristiana Rastellini M.D.
author_facet Daria Zorzi
Tammy Phan
Marco Sequi
Yong Lin
Daniel H. Freeman
Luca Cicalese
Cristiana Rastellini M.D.
author_sort Daria Zorzi
collection DOAJ
description Better results have been recently reported in clinical pancreatic islet transplantation (ITX) due mostly to improved isolation techniques and immunosuppression; however, some limitations still exist. It is known that following transplantation, 30% to 60% of the islets are lost. In our study, we have investigated 1) the role of size as a factor affecting islet engraftment and 2) potential procedural manipulations to increase the number of smaller functional islets that can be transplanted. C57/BL10 mice were used as donors and recipients in a syngeneic islet transplant model. Isolated islets were divided by size (large, >300 μm; medium 150–300 μm; small, <150 μm). Each size was transplanted in chemically induced diabetic mice as full (600 IEQ), suboptimal (400 IEQ), and marginal mass (200 IEQ). Control animals received all size islets. Engraftment was defined as reversal of diabetes by day 7 posttransplantation. When the superiority of smaller islets was observed, strategies of overdigestion and fragmentation were adopted during islet isolation in the attempt to reduce islet size and improve engraftment. Smaller islets were significantly superior in engraftment compared to medium, large, and control (all sizes) groups. This was more evident when marginal mass data were compared. In all masses, success decreased as islet size increased. Once islets were engrafted, functionality was not affected by size. When larger islets were fragmented, a significant decrease in islet functionality was observed. On the contrary, if pancreata were slightly overdigested, although not as successful as small naive islets, an increase in engraftment was observed when compared to the control group. In conclusion, smaller islets are superior in engraftment following islet transplantation. Fragmentation has a deleterious effect on islet engraftment. Islet isolations can be performed by reducing islet size with slight overdigestion, and it can be safely adopted to improve clinical outcome.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:13:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8e6f8c0336145a188a1d56ed83911ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0963-6897
1555-3892
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:13:16Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Cell Transplantation
spelling doaj.art-c8e6f8c0336145a188a1d56ed83911ef2022-12-21T23:38:53ZengSAGE PublishingCell Transplantation0963-68971555-38922015-01-012410.3727/096368913X673469Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve OutcomeDaria Zorzi0Tammy Phan1Marco Sequi2Yong Lin3Daniel H. Freeman4Luca Cicalese5Cristiana Rastellini M.D.6 Department of Surgery, Texas Transplant Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA Department of Surgery, Texas Transplant Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, Department of Public Health, “Mario Negri” Pharmacological Research Institute, Milan, Italy Department of Surgery, Texas Transplant Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA Department of Surgery, Texas Transplant Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA Department of Surgery, Texas Transplant Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USABetter results have been recently reported in clinical pancreatic islet transplantation (ITX) due mostly to improved isolation techniques and immunosuppression; however, some limitations still exist. It is known that following transplantation, 30% to 60% of the islets are lost. In our study, we have investigated 1) the role of size as a factor affecting islet engraftment and 2) potential procedural manipulations to increase the number of smaller functional islets that can be transplanted. C57/BL10 mice were used as donors and recipients in a syngeneic islet transplant model. Isolated islets were divided by size (large, >300 μm; medium 150–300 μm; small, <150 μm). Each size was transplanted in chemically induced diabetic mice as full (600 IEQ), suboptimal (400 IEQ), and marginal mass (200 IEQ). Control animals received all size islets. Engraftment was defined as reversal of diabetes by day 7 posttransplantation. When the superiority of smaller islets was observed, strategies of overdigestion and fragmentation were adopted during islet isolation in the attempt to reduce islet size and improve engraftment. Smaller islets were significantly superior in engraftment compared to medium, large, and control (all sizes) groups. This was more evident when marginal mass data were compared. In all masses, success decreased as islet size increased. Once islets were engrafted, functionality was not affected by size. When larger islets were fragmented, a significant decrease in islet functionality was observed. On the contrary, if pancreata were slightly overdigested, although not as successful as small naive islets, an increase in engraftment was observed when compared to the control group. In conclusion, smaller islets are superior in engraftment following islet transplantation. Fragmentation has a deleterious effect on islet engraftment. Islet isolations can be performed by reducing islet size with slight overdigestion, and it can be safely adopted to improve clinical outcome.https://doi.org/10.3727/096368913X673469
spellingShingle Daria Zorzi
Tammy Phan
Marco Sequi
Yong Lin
Daniel H. Freeman
Luca Cicalese
Cristiana Rastellini M.D.
Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome
Cell Transplantation
title Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome
title_full Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome
title_fullStr Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome
title_short Impact of Islet Size on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation and Potential Interventions to Improve Outcome
title_sort impact of islet size on pancreatic islet transplantation and potential interventions to improve outcome
url https://doi.org/10.3727/096368913X673469
work_keys_str_mv AT dariazorzi impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome
AT tammyphan impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome
AT marcosequi impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome
AT yonglin impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome
AT danielhfreeman impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome
AT lucacicalese impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome
AT cristianarastellinimd impactofisletsizeonpancreaticislettransplantationandpotentialinterventionstoimproveoutcome