Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ)
Introduction: Osseointegration as formulated by Alberktson is crucial for implant survival and success. Osseointegration is a measure of implant stability. Measuring implant stability helps to arrive at decisions as to loading of an implant, allows protocol choice on a patient to patient basis and p...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=5;spage=678;epage=686;aulast=Kastala |
| _version_ | 1818574898602180608 |
|---|---|
| author | Vidya Hiranmayi Kastala Mulpuri Venkata Ramoji Rao |
| author_facet | Vidya Hiranmayi Kastala Mulpuri Venkata Ramoji Rao |
| author_sort | Vidya Hiranmayi Kastala |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: Osseointegration as formulated by Alberktson is crucial for implant survival and success. Osseointegration is a measure of implant stability. Measuring implant stability helps to arrive at decisions as to loading of an implant, allows protocol choice on a patient to patient basis and provides enhanced case documentation. The RFA technique provides with clinically relevant information about the state of the implant–bone interface at any stage after implant placement. Aim: Evaluation of primary and secondary stability between implants of two different systems by resonance frequency analysis device. Methodology: This study was conducted among 17 patients divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 10) receiving 20 MIS seven implants and Group 2 (n = 7) received 20 Alphadent active implants. The primary implant stability was measured at the time of implant placement and secondary stability is measured at 3–4 months interval using RFA device OSSTELL ISQ. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test for intra group and independent sample test for intergroup comparisons. Results: No statistically significant differences in primary and secondary stabilities were found between the implant systems at either time intervals (P > 0.05). A positive correlation was noticed between mesiodistal stability and implant diameter in MIS seven group (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was noticed between mesiodistal, labiolingual stabilities and implant diameter in Alphadent group (P = 0.03). A positive correlation was noticed between mesiodistal, labiolingual stabilities and implant length in Alphadent group (P = 0.03). Conclusion: From the present data, it can be concluded that within the limitations of study, implant systems used and their design features showed no significant correlation to implant stability between the groups. More studies are required to assess the effect of implant designs and surface conditions on implant stability on a long-term basis. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-15T00:32:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c8ec863f0085409cb81ae426f637f5cf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-15T00:32:28Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-c8ec863f0085409cb81ae426f637f5cf2022-12-21T22:41:56ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032019-01-0130567868610.4103/ijdr.IJDR_446_17Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ)Vidya Hiranmayi KastalaMulpuri Venkata Ramoji RaoIntroduction: Osseointegration as formulated by Alberktson is crucial for implant survival and success. Osseointegration is a measure of implant stability. Measuring implant stability helps to arrive at decisions as to loading of an implant, allows protocol choice on a patient to patient basis and provides enhanced case documentation. The RFA technique provides with clinically relevant information about the state of the implant–bone interface at any stage after implant placement. Aim: Evaluation of primary and secondary stability between implants of two different systems by resonance frequency analysis device. Methodology: This study was conducted among 17 patients divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 10) receiving 20 MIS seven implants and Group 2 (n = 7) received 20 Alphadent active implants. The primary implant stability was measured at the time of implant placement and secondary stability is measured at 3–4 months interval using RFA device OSSTELL ISQ. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test for intra group and independent sample test for intergroup comparisons. Results: No statistically significant differences in primary and secondary stabilities were found between the implant systems at either time intervals (P > 0.05). A positive correlation was noticed between mesiodistal stability and implant diameter in MIS seven group (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was noticed between mesiodistal, labiolingual stabilities and implant diameter in Alphadent group (P = 0.03). A positive correlation was noticed between mesiodistal, labiolingual stabilities and implant length in Alphadent group (P = 0.03). Conclusion: From the present data, it can be concluded that within the limitations of study, implant systems used and their design features showed no significant correlation to implant stability between the groups. More studies are required to assess the effect of implant designs and surface conditions on implant stability on a long-term basis.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=5;spage=678;epage=686;aulast=Kastalaendosseous implantsosseointegrationprimary stabilityresonance frequency analysissecondary stability |
| spellingShingle | Vidya Hiranmayi Kastala Mulpuri Venkata Ramoji Rao Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ) Indian Journal of Dental Research endosseous implants osseointegration primary stability resonance frequency analysis secondary stability |
| title | Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ) |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ) |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ) |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3–4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL ISQ) |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3 4 months intervals using rfa device osstell isq |
| topic | endosseous implants osseointegration primary stability resonance frequency analysis secondary stability |
| url | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=5;spage=678;epage=686;aulast=Kastala |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vidyahiranmayikastala comparativeevaluationofimplantstabilityintwodifferentimplantsystemsatbaselineand34monthsintervalsusingrfadeviceosstellisq AT mulpurivenkataramojirao comparativeevaluationofimplantstabilityintwodifferentimplantsystemsatbaselineand34monthsintervalsusingrfadeviceosstellisq |