The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society
volution by natural selection applied by sociologists has been met with great resistance since Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), marked by dark notions of power and authority associated with an uncritical and enthusiastic application of natural selection to fashionable notions of race and priv...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Big History Association
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Big History |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jbh.journals.villanova.edu/index.php/JBH/article/view/2340/2267 |
| _version_ | 1797774641039671296 |
|---|---|
| author | Anthony Nairn |
| author_facet | Anthony Nairn |
| author_sort | Anthony Nairn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | volution by natural selection applied by sociologists has been met with great resistance since Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), marked by dark notions of power and authority associated with an uncritical and enthusiastic application of natural selection to fashionable notions of race and privilege. E.O. Wilson’s (1929-) Sociobiology (1975) attempted to reignite the possibilities of evolutionary discourse using modern genetics to social systems but was stymied by the racialized legacy and liberal notions of “genetic determinism.” Here, the sociobiological framework is re-imagined by extending it from individual gene mechanisms and behavior, into social figurations of large-scale actor networks. Using the conceptual tools and historical analysis of Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society (1983), detailing Louis XVI’s court and the interdependencies between its members, I will be suggesting that these networks of interdependence composed of individual actors are facilitated and constrained by the processes of natural selection, and therefore can be analyzed as such. The entanglement of dependencies created by actors within a network formulates “massing” points that identify the networks form and function as a “social organism”. The value gained in understanding the organic fluidity of social networks, how they are formed, shaped, evolve, and come into conflict with competing social figurations, may provide a new and naturally derived way of interpreting interdependent social actor networks, and provide greater depth into the conceptualization of human social relations. Finally, such a view of history and sociology would align with the principles of Big History by understanding the human subject as bound to the same processes of development that have been occurring to all forms of matter in the Universe over the last 13.8 billion years. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:24:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c8ec8d77e92b44dda5a883b8d32c0a64 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2475-3610 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:24:04Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | International Big History Association |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Big History |
| spelling | doaj.art-c8ec8d77e92b44dda5a883b8d32c0a642023-07-23T01:36:51ZengInternational Big History AssociationJournal of Big History2475-36102019-01-01316176http://dx.doi.org/10.22339/jbh.v3i1.3140The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court SocietyAnthony Nairn0University of Torontovolution by natural selection applied by sociologists has been met with great resistance since Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), marked by dark notions of power and authority associated with an uncritical and enthusiastic application of natural selection to fashionable notions of race and privilege. E.O. Wilson’s (1929-) Sociobiology (1975) attempted to reignite the possibilities of evolutionary discourse using modern genetics to social systems but was stymied by the racialized legacy and liberal notions of “genetic determinism.” Here, the sociobiological framework is re-imagined by extending it from individual gene mechanisms and behavior, into social figurations of large-scale actor networks. Using the conceptual tools and historical analysis of Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society (1983), detailing Louis XVI’s court and the interdependencies between its members, I will be suggesting that these networks of interdependence composed of individual actors are facilitated and constrained by the processes of natural selection, and therefore can be analyzed as such. The entanglement of dependencies created by actors within a network formulates “massing” points that identify the networks form and function as a “social organism”. The value gained in understanding the organic fluidity of social networks, how they are formed, shaped, evolve, and come into conflict with competing social figurations, may provide a new and naturally derived way of interpreting interdependent social actor networks, and provide greater depth into the conceptualization of human social relations. Finally, such a view of history and sociology would align with the principles of Big History by understanding the human subject as bound to the same processes of development that have been occurring to all forms of matter in the Universe over the last 13.8 billion years.https://jbh.journals.villanova.edu/index.php/JBH/article/view/2340/2267evolutionsociobiologysociologyhistoryking louis; francefrench revolutionnorbert eliascourt societysocial networksinterdependencynatural selection |
| spellingShingle | Anthony Nairn The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society Journal of Big History evolution sociobiology sociology history king louis; france french revolution norbert elias court society social networks interdependency natural selection |
| title | The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society |
| title_full | The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society |
| title_fullStr | The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society |
| title_short | The Evolution of Social Constructs: A Proposal for the Re-Conceptualization of Sociobiology for Understanding Interdependent Social Networks as Evolving “Organisms” Using Norbert Elias’s, The Court Society |
| title_sort | evolution of social constructs a proposal for the re conceptualization of sociobiology for understanding interdependent social networks as evolving organisms using norbert elias s the court society |
| topic | evolution sociobiology sociology history king louis; france french revolution norbert elias court society social networks interdependency natural selection |
| url | https://jbh.journals.villanova.edu/index.php/JBH/article/view/2340/2267 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anthonynairn theevolutionofsocialconstructsaproposalforthereconceptualizationofsociobiologyforunderstandinginterdependentsocialnetworksasevolvingorganismsusingnorberteliassthecourtsociety AT anthonynairn evolutionofsocialconstructsaproposalforthereconceptualizationofsociobiologyforunderstandinginterdependentsocialnetworksasevolvingorganismsusingnorberteliassthecourtsociety |