The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)

The objective is to determine the optimal synthetic material for endoprosthetics of the abdominal wall.Material and methods. The experiments were conducted on 50 rabbits of the Chinchilla breed, which were divided into 2 groups of 25 individuals in the each group. In the first group, a lightweight p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. S. Sukovatykh, M. A. Zatolokina, T. V. Mutova, N. M. Valuyskaya, V. A. Zhukovsky, T. S. Philipenko, V. Ya. Mutov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University 2019-04-01
Series:Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/1041
_version_ 1826962572967936000
author B. S. Sukovatykh
M. A. Zatolokina
T. V. Mutova
N. M. Valuyskaya
V. A. Zhukovsky
T. S. Philipenko
V. Ya. Mutov
author_facet B. S. Sukovatykh
M. A. Zatolokina
T. V. Mutova
N. M. Valuyskaya
V. A. Zhukovsky
T. S. Philipenko
V. Ya. Mutov
author_sort B. S. Sukovatykh
collection DOAJ
description The objective is to determine the optimal synthetic material for endoprosthetics of the abdominal wall.Material and methods. The experiments were conducted on 50 rabbits of the Chinchilla breed, which were divided into 2 groups of 25 individuals in the each group. In the first group, a lightweight polypropylene endoprosthesis with filament diameter of 90 microns was implanted at the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall, and in the second group – a super-lightweight polypropylene polyvinylidene fluoride endoprothesis with filament diameter of 70 microns. We performed morphometric and histological study of reactive changes in the tissue surrounding the implanted endoprosthesis.Results. In the animals of the second group, the inflammatory response to the implanted prosthesis was on the 3rd day of the experiment lower by 1.3 times, on the 7th day – 1.2 times, on the 10th – 1.1 times; fibroblastic response on the contrary increased 1.2, 1.12, 1.16 times on the same days.Conclusion. When choosing a lightweight synthetic material for hernioplasty, the preference should be given to the super-lightweight polypropylenepolyvinylidene fluoride endoprosthesis.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:19:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c8f352ef7dce4fcdaf3a9aa5085c85e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-4625
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-02-18T02:17:17Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
record_format Article
series Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова
spelling doaj.art-c8f352ef7dce4fcdaf3a9aa5085c85e92024-11-26T10:43:53ZrusPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityВестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова0042-46252019-04-011782465110.24884/0042-4625-2019-178-2-46-51998The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)B. S. Sukovatykh0M. A. Zatolokina1T. V. Mutova2N. M. Valuyskaya3V. A. Zhukovsky4T. S. Philipenko5V. Ya. Mutov6Kursk state medical University.Kursk state medical University.Kursk state medical University.Kursk state medical University.LLP «Linteks».LLP «Linteks».Kursk City Hospital №2.The objective is to determine the optimal synthetic material for endoprosthetics of the abdominal wall.Material and methods. The experiments were conducted on 50 rabbits of the Chinchilla breed, which were divided into 2 groups of 25 individuals in the each group. In the first group, a lightweight polypropylene endoprosthesis with filament diameter of 90 microns was implanted at the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall, and in the second group – a super-lightweight polypropylene polyvinylidene fluoride endoprothesis with filament diameter of 70 microns. We performed morphometric and histological study of reactive changes in the tissue surrounding the implanted endoprosthesis.Results. In the animals of the second group, the inflammatory response to the implanted prosthesis was on the 3rd day of the experiment lower by 1.3 times, on the 7th day – 1.2 times, on the 10th – 1.1 times; fibroblastic response on the contrary increased 1.2, 1.12, 1.16 times on the same days.Conclusion. When choosing a lightweight synthetic material for hernioplasty, the preference should be given to the super-lightweight polypropylenepolyvinylidene fluoride endoprosthesis.https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/1041abdominal walllightweight polypropylene prosthesissuper-lightweight polypropylene polyvinylidene fluoride endoprosthesisconnective tissue capsule
spellingShingle B. S. Sukovatykh
M. A. Zatolokina
T. V. Mutova
N. M. Valuyskaya
V. A. Zhukovsky
T. S. Philipenko
V. Ya. Mutov
The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)
Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова
abdominal wall
lightweight polypropylene prosthesis
super-lightweight polypropylene polyvinylidene fluoride endoprosthesis
connective tissue capsule
title The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)
title_full The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)
title_fullStr The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)
title_full_unstemmed The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)
title_short The choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall (experimental study)
title_sort choice of lightweight synthetic material for replacement of the abdominal wall experimental study
topic abdominal wall
lightweight polypropylene prosthesis
super-lightweight polypropylene polyvinylidene fluoride endoprosthesis
connective tissue capsule
url https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/1041
work_keys_str_mv AT bssukovatykh thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT mazatolokina thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT tvmutova thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT nmvaluyskaya thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT vazhukovsky thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT tsphilipenko thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT vyamutov thechoiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT bssukovatykh choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT mazatolokina choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT tvmutova choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT nmvaluyskaya choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT vazhukovsky choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT tsphilipenko choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy
AT vyamutov choiceoflightweightsyntheticmaterialforreplacementoftheabdominalwallexperimentalstudy