Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection
Abstract Objective The present study aimed to compare the cure rate recovery time and Merle d'Aubigné-Postel functional (MAPF) score after single-stage surgery (C1T) or two-stage surgery (C2T) to treat prosthetic infections of the hip considering sociodemographic and clinical features of the pa...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000500781&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1797326961914150912 |
---|---|
author | Ricardo Tomé Branco Eurico Bandeira Rodrigues |
author_facet | Ricardo Tomé Branco Eurico Bandeira Rodrigues |
author_sort | Ricardo Tomé Branco |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective The present study aimed to compare the cure rate recovery time and Merle d'Aubigné-Postel functional (MAPF) score after single-stage surgery (C1T) or two-stage surgery (C2T) to treat prosthetic infections of the hip considering sociodemographic and clinical features of the patients. Materials and Methods The present retrospective study occurred in a single center from 2011 to 2014 with 37 studied cases including 26 treated with C1T and 11 with C2T. We compared the cure rate recovery time and MAPF score in the two groups as well as the sociodemographic and clinical features of the patients. We also considered surgical complications and the most common infectious agents. Results The C1T group had a faster functional recovery than the C2T group but there were no significant differences in the cure rate surgical complications or MAPF score. However C1T group patients were significantly younger which may have influenced the outcomes. Staphylococcus spp. was the most common infectious agent (62%). Conclusion Although C2T appears superior regarding infection cure C1T may be preferable for faster functional recovery. However it is critical to consider individual patient characteristics when choosing treatment. Further research with a larger sample size is required to confirm these results. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T06:31:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c90cc5e15c1d4e8ab76b5b97cfdcbf02 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1982-4378 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T06:31:40Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
spelling | doaj.art-c90cc5e15c1d4e8ab76b5b97cfdcbf022024-02-03T11:40:01ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782023-12-0158578178910.1055/s-0043-1776132Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic InfectionRicardo Tomé Brancohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4936-1774Eurico Bandeira Rodrigueshttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-5353-8679Abstract Objective The present study aimed to compare the cure rate recovery time and Merle d'Aubigné-Postel functional (MAPF) score after single-stage surgery (C1T) or two-stage surgery (C2T) to treat prosthetic infections of the hip considering sociodemographic and clinical features of the patients. Materials and Methods The present retrospective study occurred in a single center from 2011 to 2014 with 37 studied cases including 26 treated with C1T and 11 with C2T. We compared the cure rate recovery time and MAPF score in the two groups as well as the sociodemographic and clinical features of the patients. We also considered surgical complications and the most common infectious agents. Results The C1T group had a faster functional recovery than the C2T group but there were no significant differences in the cure rate surgical complications or MAPF score. However C1T group patients were significantly younger which may have influenced the outcomes. Staphylococcus spp. was the most common infectious agent (62%). Conclusion Although C2T appears superior regarding infection cure C1T may be preferable for faster functional recovery. However it is critical to consider individual patient characteristics when choosing treatment. Further research with a larger sample size is required to confirm these results.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000500781&lng=en&tlng=enarthroplasty, replacement, hipprosthesis-related infectionship prosthesisrecovery of functionreoperation |
spellingShingle | Ricardo Tomé Branco Eurico Bandeira Rodrigues Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia arthroplasty, replacement, hip prosthesis-related infections hip prosthesis recovery of function reoperation |
title | Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection |
title_full | Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection |
title_short | Comparison of Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Infection |
title_sort | comparison of surgical procedures in the treatment of hip periprosthetic infection |
topic | arthroplasty, replacement, hip prosthesis-related infections hip prosthesis recovery of function reoperation |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000500781&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricardotomebranco comparisonofsurgicalproceduresinthetreatmentofhipperiprostheticinfection AT euricobandeirarodrigues comparisonofsurgicalproceduresinthetreatmentofhipperiprostheticinfection |