Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals

Purpose: This study aimed to characterize contemporary management of Canadian patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing radiation therapy (RT) in light of updated American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidelines. Methods and Materials: A 22-question web-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir H. Safavi, MD, MSc, Alexander V. Louie, MD, PhD, Alyaa H. Elzibak, PhD, Andrew Warner, MSc, Elysia K. Donovan, MD, MSc, Jay S. Detsky, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109423000131
_version_ 1797900659165495296
author Amir H. Safavi, MD, MSc
Alexander V. Louie, MD, PhD
Alyaa H. Elzibak, PhD
Andrew Warner, MSc
Elysia K. Donovan, MD, MSc
Jay S. Detsky, MD, PhD
author_facet Amir H. Safavi, MD, MSc
Alexander V. Louie, MD, PhD
Alyaa H. Elzibak, PhD
Andrew Warner, MSc
Elysia K. Donovan, MD, MSc
Jay S. Detsky, MD, PhD
author_sort Amir H. Safavi, MD, MSc
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study aimed to characterize contemporary management of Canadian patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing radiation therapy (RT) in light of updated American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidelines. Methods and Materials: A 22-question web-based survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology, Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists, and Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists from January to February 2020. Respondent demographics, knowledge, and management practices were elicited. Statistical comparisons by respondent demographics were performed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Results: In total, 155 surveys were completed by 54 radiation oncologists, 26 medical physicists, and 75 radiation therapists in academic (51%) and community (49%) practices across all provinces. The majority of respondents (77%) had managed >10 patients with CIEDs in their career. Most respondents (70%) reported using risk-stratified institutional management protocols. Respondents used manufacturer recommendations, rather than American Association of Physicists in Medicine or institutionally recommended dose limits, when the manufacturer limit was 0 Gy (44%), 0 to 2 Gy (45%), or >2 Gy (34%). The majority of respondents (86%) reported institutional policies to refer to a cardiologist for CIED evaluation both before and after completion of RT. Cumulative dose to CIED, pacing dependence, and neutron production were considered during risk stratification by 86%, 74%, and 50% of participants, respectively. Dose and energy thresholds for high-risk management were not known by 45% and 52% of respondents, with radiation oncologists and radiation therapists significantly less likely to report thresholds than medical physicists (P < .001). Although 59% of respondents felt comfortable managing patients with CIEDs, community respondents were less likely to feel comfortable than academic respondents (P = .037). Conclusions: The management of Canadian patients with CIEDs undergoing RT is characterized by variability and uncertainty. National consensus guidelines may have a role in improving provider knowledge and confidence in caring for this growing population.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:49:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c92be54154f149fabc6fd5bb7acfe5f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-1094
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:49:28Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-c92be54154f149fabc6fd5bb7acfe5f42023-02-22T04:32:03ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942023-07-0184101184Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology ProfessionalsAmir H. Safavi, MD, MSc0Alexander V. Louie, MD, PhD1Alyaa H. Elzibak, PhD2Andrew Warner, MSc3Elysia K. Donovan, MD, MSc4Jay S. Detsky, MD, PhD5Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre – Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre – Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre – Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Corresponding author: Jay S. Detsky, MD, PhDPurpose: This study aimed to characterize contemporary management of Canadian patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing radiation therapy (RT) in light of updated American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidelines. Methods and Materials: A 22-question web-based survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology, Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists, and Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists from January to February 2020. Respondent demographics, knowledge, and management practices were elicited. Statistical comparisons by respondent demographics were performed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Results: In total, 155 surveys were completed by 54 radiation oncologists, 26 medical physicists, and 75 radiation therapists in academic (51%) and community (49%) practices across all provinces. The majority of respondents (77%) had managed >10 patients with CIEDs in their career. Most respondents (70%) reported using risk-stratified institutional management protocols. Respondents used manufacturer recommendations, rather than American Association of Physicists in Medicine or institutionally recommended dose limits, when the manufacturer limit was 0 Gy (44%), 0 to 2 Gy (45%), or >2 Gy (34%). The majority of respondents (86%) reported institutional policies to refer to a cardiologist for CIED evaluation both before and after completion of RT. Cumulative dose to CIED, pacing dependence, and neutron production were considered during risk stratification by 86%, 74%, and 50% of participants, respectively. Dose and energy thresholds for high-risk management were not known by 45% and 52% of respondents, with radiation oncologists and radiation therapists significantly less likely to report thresholds than medical physicists (P < .001). Although 59% of respondents felt comfortable managing patients with CIEDs, community respondents were less likely to feel comfortable than academic respondents (P = .037). Conclusions: The management of Canadian patients with CIEDs undergoing RT is characterized by variability and uncertainty. National consensus guidelines may have a role in improving provider knowledge and confidence in caring for this growing population.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109423000131
spellingShingle Amir H. Safavi, MD, MSc
Alexander V. Louie, MD, PhD
Alyaa H. Elzibak, PhD
Andrew Warner, MSc
Elysia K. Donovan, MD, MSc
Jay S. Detsky, MD, PhD
Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals
title_full Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals
title_fullStr Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals
title_short Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A National Survey of Canadian Multidisciplinary Radiation Oncology Professionals
title_sort management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices undergoing radiation therapy a national survey of canadian multidisciplinary radiation oncology professionals
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109423000131
work_keys_str_mv AT amirhsafavimdmsc managementofpatientswithcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdevicesundergoingradiationtherapyanationalsurveyofcanadianmultidisciplinaryradiationoncologyprofessionals
AT alexandervlouiemdphd managementofpatientswithcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdevicesundergoingradiationtherapyanationalsurveyofcanadianmultidisciplinaryradiationoncologyprofessionals
AT alyaahelzibakphd managementofpatientswithcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdevicesundergoingradiationtherapyanationalsurveyofcanadianmultidisciplinaryradiationoncologyprofessionals
AT andrewwarnermsc managementofpatientswithcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdevicesundergoingradiationtherapyanationalsurveyofcanadianmultidisciplinaryradiationoncologyprofessionals
AT elysiakdonovanmdmsc managementofpatientswithcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdevicesundergoingradiationtherapyanationalsurveyofcanadianmultidisciplinaryradiationoncologyprofessionals
AT jaysdetskymdphd managementofpatientswithcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdevicesundergoingradiationtherapyanationalsurveyofcanadianmultidisciplinaryradiationoncologyprofessionals