Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network

Introduction: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tara P. McAlexander, Gargya Malla, Jalal Uddin, David C. Lee, Brian S. Schwartz, Deborah B. Rolka, Karen R. Siegel, Rania Kanchi, Jonathan Pollak, Linda Andes, April P. Carson, Lorna E. Thorpe, Leslie A. McClure
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:SSM: Population Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827322001409
_version_ 1811237168081797120
author Tara P. McAlexander
Gargya Malla
Jalal Uddin
David C. Lee
Brian S. Schwartz
Deborah B. Rolka
Karen R. Siegel
Rania Kanchi
Jonathan Pollak
Linda Andes
April P. Carson
Lorna E. Thorpe
Leslie A. McClure
author_facet Tara P. McAlexander
Gargya Malla
Jalal Uddin
David C. Lee
Brian S. Schwartz
Deborah B. Rolka
Karen R. Siegel
Rania Kanchi
Jonathan Pollak
Linda Andes
April P. Carson
Lorna E. Thorpe
Leslie A. McClure
author_sort Tara P. McAlexander
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large study samples covering the US. Research design and methods: We evaluated the likelihood of new onset T2D by a census tract-level measure of community type, a modification of RUCA designations (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural) in three longitudinal US study samples (REGARDS [REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke] cohort, VADR [Veterans Affairs Diabetes Risk] cohort, Geisinger electronic health records) representing the CDC Diabetes LEAD (Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities) Network. Results: In the REGARDS sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the lowest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.66, 0.97]) compared to rural community types; in the Geisinger sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the highest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.06, 1.35]) compared to rural community types. In the VADR sample, suburban/small town community types had the lowest hazard ratios of new onset T2D (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.98, 1.00]). However, in a regional stratified analysis of the VADR sample, the likelihood of new onset T2D was consistent with findings in the REGARDS and Geisinger samples, with highest likelihood of T2D in the rural South and in the higher density urban communities of the Northeast and West regions; likelihood of T2D did not differ by community type in the Midwest. Conclusions: The likelihood of new onset T2D by community type varied by region of the US. In the South, the likelihood of new onset T2D was higher among those residing in rural communities.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:21:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c92cc8c158484251aa2f0b12db6897fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8273
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:21:28Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SSM: Population Health
spelling doaj.art-c92cc8c158484251aa2f0b12db6897fb2022-12-22T03:33:18ZengElsevierSSM: Population Health2352-82732022-09-0119101161Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD networkTara P. McAlexander0Gargya Malla1Jalal Uddin2David C. Lee3Brian S. Schwartz4Deborah B. Rolka5Karen R. Siegel6Rania Kanchi7Jonathan Pollak8Linda Andes9April P. Carson10Lorna E. Thorpe11Leslie A. McClure12Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USADepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USADepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USADivision of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USADivision of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USADepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USADepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USADivision of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USADepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39213, USADepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corresponding author.Introduction: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large study samples covering the US. Research design and methods: We evaluated the likelihood of new onset T2D by a census tract-level measure of community type, a modification of RUCA designations (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural) in three longitudinal US study samples (REGARDS [REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke] cohort, VADR [Veterans Affairs Diabetes Risk] cohort, Geisinger electronic health records) representing the CDC Diabetes LEAD (Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities) Network. Results: In the REGARDS sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the lowest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.66, 0.97]) compared to rural community types; in the Geisinger sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the highest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.06, 1.35]) compared to rural community types. In the VADR sample, suburban/small town community types had the lowest hazard ratios of new onset T2D (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.98, 1.00]). However, in a regional stratified analysis of the VADR sample, the likelihood of new onset T2D was consistent with findings in the REGARDS and Geisinger samples, with highest likelihood of T2D in the rural South and in the higher density urban communities of the Northeast and West regions; likelihood of T2D did not differ by community type in the Midwest. Conclusions: The likelihood of new onset T2D by community type varied by region of the US. In the South, the likelihood of new onset T2D was higher among those residing in rural communities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827322001409DiabetesCommunity typeUrbanRuralGeographic disparities
spellingShingle Tara P. McAlexander
Gargya Malla
Jalal Uddin
David C. Lee
Brian S. Schwartz
Deborah B. Rolka
Karen R. Siegel
Rania Kanchi
Jonathan Pollak
Linda Andes
April P. Carson
Lorna E. Thorpe
Leslie A. McClure
Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
SSM: Population Health
Diabetes
Community type
Urban
Rural
Geographic disparities
title Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_full Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_fullStr Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_full_unstemmed Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_short Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_sort urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes lead network
topic Diabetes
Community type
Urban
Rural
Geographic disparities
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827322001409
work_keys_str_mv AT tarapmcalexander urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT gargyamalla urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT jalaluddin urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT davidclee urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT briansschwartz urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT deborahbrolka urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT karenrsiegel urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT raniakanchi urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT jonathanpollak urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT lindaandes urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT aprilpcarson urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT lornaethorpe urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT leslieamcclure urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork