Are Replications Mainstream now? A Comparison of Support for Replications Expressed in the Policies of Social Psychology Journals in 2015 and 2022
A decade ago, replications were typically not conducted and appreciated in social psychology, although replications play a central role in ensuring trust in scientific fields. Without systematic replication efforts, it is not clear whether findings are trustworthy. As journals can function as gateke...
Main Authors: | Ann-Kathrin Torka, Jens Mazei, Joachim Hüffmeier |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Social Psychological Bulletin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.9695 |
Similar Items
-
The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science
by: Lukas Röseler, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Replicability and replication in the humanities
by: Rik Peels
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Replication marketplaces would help science to become more self-correcting
by: Joachim Hüffmeier, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
The replicability crisis as chance for psychological research and South African Journal of Industrial Psychology
by: Alina S. Hernandez Bark
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Replication, a Hallmark of Good Science: Unraveling the Factors That Predict Replication Success
by: Grant, Malcolm, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)