Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment

This study aimed to evaluate VHP as a decontamination method for decontaminating reusable PAPR; determine if PAPR is compatible with VHP; and determine how long it takes for hydrogen peroxide to off-gas for the mask to be safe for reuse. Off-gassing validation study which consisted of doing three VH...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Rondinone, Tautvydas Karitonas, Enrico Allegra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Cogent Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311916.2022.2065903
_version_ 1827846808895750144
author Daniela Rondinone
Tautvydas Karitonas
Enrico Allegra
author_facet Daniela Rondinone
Tautvydas Karitonas
Enrico Allegra
author_sort Daniela Rondinone
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to evaluate VHP as a decontamination method for decontaminating reusable PAPR; determine if PAPR is compatible with VHP; and determine how long it takes for hydrogen peroxide to off-gas for the mask to be safe for reuse. Off-gassing validation study which consisted of doing three VHP decontamination processes followed by three Off-Gassing Tests to confirm the efficacy of the VHP cycle and time required for the VHP concentration to reach 0 ppm. HALT, which consisted of exposing the PAPR to 50 VHP decontamination cycles followed by a Visual Appearance Test to determine if the VHP process impacted the PAPR material’s visual properties. The results from this study show that VHP is an effective and repeatable process for decontaminating PAPR, and the Off-Gassing Test shows that with the appropriate off-gassing set up, it is possible to off-gas one PAPR within 8 hours of completing the decontamination cycle. The results from the Visual Appearance Test show that exposing a PAPR to 50 decontamination cycles does not present significant changes in the PAPR material’s colour, opacity, or overall visual appearance.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:21:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c92e9aab349a48be9f8455a2dda11a35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1916
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:21:35Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Engineering
spelling doaj.art-c92e9aab349a48be9f8455a2dda11a352023-09-02T14:27:33ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Engineering2331-19162022-12-019110.1080/23311916.2022.2065903Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipmentDaniela Rondinone0Tautvydas Karitonas1Enrico Allegra2Research Manager at Test Labs, Peterborough, UKHead of Research and Development at Test Labs, Peterborough, UKLead Microbiologist and Technical Lead at Test Labs, Peterborough, UKThis study aimed to evaluate VHP as a decontamination method for decontaminating reusable PAPR; determine if PAPR is compatible with VHP; and determine how long it takes for hydrogen peroxide to off-gas for the mask to be safe for reuse. Off-gassing validation study which consisted of doing three VHP decontamination processes followed by three Off-Gassing Tests to confirm the efficacy of the VHP cycle and time required for the VHP concentration to reach 0 ppm. HALT, which consisted of exposing the PAPR to 50 VHP decontamination cycles followed by a Visual Appearance Test to determine if the VHP process impacted the PAPR material’s visual properties. The results from this study show that VHP is an effective and repeatable process for decontaminating PAPR, and the Off-Gassing Test shows that with the appropriate off-gassing set up, it is possible to off-gas one PAPR within 8 hours of completing the decontamination cycle. The results from the Visual Appearance Test show that exposing a PAPR to 50 decontamination cycles does not present significant changes in the PAPR material’s colour, opacity, or overall visual appearance.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311916.2022.2065903Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPR)Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)decontaminationVaporised Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP)infection controlcompatibility
spellingShingle Daniela Rondinone
Tautvydas Karitonas
Enrico Allegra
Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
Cogent Engineering
Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPR)
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
decontamination
Vaporised Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP)
infection control
compatibility
title Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
title_full Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
title_fullStr Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
title_short Compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
title_sort compatibility and efficacy of vaporised hydrogen peroxide technology to decontaminate reusable personal protective equipment
topic Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPR)
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
decontamination
Vaporised Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP)
infection control
compatibility
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311916.2022.2065903
work_keys_str_mv AT danielarondinone compatibilityandefficacyofvaporisedhydrogenperoxidetechnologytodecontaminatereusablepersonalprotectiveequipment
AT tautvydaskaritonas compatibilityandefficacyofvaporisedhydrogenperoxidetechnologytodecontaminatereusablepersonalprotectiveequipment
AT enricoallegra compatibilityandefficacyofvaporisedhydrogenperoxidetechnologytodecontaminatereusablepersonalprotectiveequipment