Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines

Our aim was to validate a new device for pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement – Aortic according to the recommendations of the Artery Society and using SphygmoCor as the comparator device. Methods: 85 subjects 18–80 years-old from both sexes were included, divided into 3 age-groups: <30, 30...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margarita S. Morales, Paula E. Cuffaro, Jessica Barochiner, Marcelo A. Rada, Jose Alfie, Lucas Aparicio, Marcos Marin, Carlos R. Galarza, Gabriel D. Waisman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2015-04-01
Series:Artery Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125938907/view
_version_ 1818008036255465472
author Margarita S. Morales
Paula E. Cuffaro
Jessica Barochiner
Marcelo A. Rada
Jose Alfie
Lucas Aparicio
Marcos Marin
Carlos R. Galarza
Gabriel D. Waisman
author_facet Margarita S. Morales
Paula E. Cuffaro
Jessica Barochiner
Marcelo A. Rada
Jose Alfie
Lucas Aparicio
Marcos Marin
Carlos R. Galarza
Gabriel D. Waisman
author_sort Margarita S. Morales
collection DOAJ
description Our aim was to validate a new device for pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement – Aortic according to the recommendations of the Artery Society and using SphygmoCor as the comparator device. Methods: 85 subjects 18–80 years-old from both sexes were included, divided into 3 age-groups: <30, 30–60 and >60 years (minimum of 25 individuals per group) and with an equal number of hypertensive and normotensive subjects per group. Weight, height, blood pressure (BP) and PWV were assessed, performing 6 PWV determinations per subject: 3 with Aortic and 3 with SphygmoCor, in an alternate fashion. The Bland–Altman method was used to establish the level of agreement between the two devices. Results: PWV was 6.96 (±1.84) and 7 (±1.54) m/s with Aortic and SphygmoCor, respectively, showing a high correlation: r = 0.89, p < 0.001. Applying the Bland–Altman method, the mean difference between devices was 0.02 (±0.84) m/s, which is considered an excellent level of agreement. Of the study population, 75.3% (n = 64), 15.3% (n = 13) and 9.4% (n = 8) reached an excellent (mean difference ≤0.5 ± 0.8 m/s), acceptable (mean difference ≤1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) and poor (mean difference ≥ 1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) level of agreement, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic showed an excellent level of agreement with SphygmoCor, the reference method, according to the Artery Society recommendations for PWV measurement. This was observed particularly for lower PWV values.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:23:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c94009c6bf4f440786071388c2546abb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-4401
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:23:51Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Artery Research
spelling doaj.art-c94009c6bf4f440786071388c2546abb2022-12-22T02:10:03ZengBMCArtery Research1876-44012015-04-011010.1016/j.artres.2015.03.001Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelinesMargarita S. MoralesPaula E. CuffaroJessica BarochinerMarcelo A. RadaJose AlfieLucas AparicioMarcos MarinCarlos R. GalarzaGabriel D. WaismanOur aim was to validate a new device for pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement – Aortic according to the recommendations of the Artery Society and using SphygmoCor as the comparator device. Methods: 85 subjects 18–80 years-old from both sexes were included, divided into 3 age-groups: <30, 30–60 and >60 years (minimum of 25 individuals per group) and with an equal number of hypertensive and normotensive subjects per group. Weight, height, blood pressure (BP) and PWV were assessed, performing 6 PWV determinations per subject: 3 with Aortic and 3 with SphygmoCor, in an alternate fashion. The Bland–Altman method was used to establish the level of agreement between the two devices. Results: PWV was 6.96 (±1.84) and 7 (±1.54) m/s with Aortic and SphygmoCor, respectively, showing a high correlation: r = 0.89, p < 0.001. Applying the Bland–Altman method, the mean difference between devices was 0.02 (±0.84) m/s, which is considered an excellent level of agreement. Of the study population, 75.3% (n = 64), 15.3% (n = 13) and 9.4% (n = 8) reached an excellent (mean difference ≤0.5 ± 0.8 m/s), acceptable (mean difference ≤1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) and poor (mean difference ≥ 1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) level of agreement, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic showed an excellent level of agreement with SphygmoCor, the reference method, according to the Artery Society recommendations for PWV measurement. This was observed particularly for lower PWV values.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125938907/viewArterial stiffnessPulse wave velocityValidationPiezo-electronic
spellingShingle Margarita S. Morales
Paula E. Cuffaro
Jessica Barochiner
Marcelo A. Rada
Jose Alfie
Lucas Aparicio
Marcos Marin
Carlos R. Galarza
Gabriel D. Waisman
Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
Artery Research
Arterial stiffness
Pulse wave velocity
Validation
Piezo-electronic
title Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
title_full Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
title_fullStr Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
title_short Validation of a new piezo-electronic device for non-invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
title_sort validation of a new piezo electronic device for non invasive measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity according to the artery society guidelines
topic Arterial stiffness
Pulse wave velocity
Validation
Piezo-electronic
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125938907/view
work_keys_str_mv AT margaritasmorales validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT paulaecuffaro validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT jessicabarochiner validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT marceloarada validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT josealfie validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT lucasaparicio validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT marcosmarin validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT carlosrgalarza validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines
AT gabrieldwaisman validationofanewpiezoelectronicdevicefornoninvasivemeasurementofarterialpulsewavevelocityaccordingtothearterysocietyguidelines