Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing

While some human rights theorists suggest that the universalistic project of human rights can be consistent only with an individualistic conception of dignity aligned with liberal regimes, there have also been some voices of discontent raised from Christian and Confucian thinkers in favor of incompa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eun Young Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/5/264
_version_ 1797567250774884352
author Eun Young Hwang
author_facet Eun Young Hwang
author_sort Eun Young Hwang
collection DOAJ
description While some human rights theorists suggest that the universalistic project of human rights can be consistent only with an individualistic conception of dignity aligned with liberal regimes, there have also been some voices of discontent raised from Christian and Confucian thinkers in favor of incompatibility. I refer to the universalistic position of approaching cross-cultural human rights by focusing on Pogge’s contextualistic universalism and Joas’ universalistic emphasis on the sacredness of person. I show how it is possible to ground the religious foundation of human dignity on self-transcendence (Joas) and the institutional foundation on the capacity for the pursuit of a worthwhile life as flourishing (Pogge). This idea of dignity grounds human rights as the entitlement to institutional measures for securing the access to basic goods for human flourishing (Pogge). When reinterpreting Augustine and Xunzi in light of human dignity and human rights, I tackle two questions, following Pogge and Joas. First, I reinterpret Augustine and Xunzi by showing how human dignity rests on the relative worth of pursuing one’s flourishing distinct from animals and the absolute worth of pursuing flourishing open for self-transcendence, which also entails different ranges of social conceptions of flourishing. I also tackle how this sense of dignity leads to the entitlement to institutional measures for protecting the access to basic goods for human flourishing as the issue of human rights.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:39:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c948df0cbfca4f149aea462c267693d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:39:01Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-c948df0cbfca4f149aea462c267693d62023-11-20T01:25:09ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-05-0111526410.3390/rel11050264Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human FlourishingEun Young Hwang0Divinity School, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USAWhile some human rights theorists suggest that the universalistic project of human rights can be consistent only with an individualistic conception of dignity aligned with liberal regimes, there have also been some voices of discontent raised from Christian and Confucian thinkers in favor of incompatibility. I refer to the universalistic position of approaching cross-cultural human rights by focusing on Pogge’s contextualistic universalism and Joas’ universalistic emphasis on the sacredness of person. I show how it is possible to ground the religious foundation of human dignity on self-transcendence (Joas) and the institutional foundation on the capacity for the pursuit of a worthwhile life as flourishing (Pogge). This idea of dignity grounds human rights as the entitlement to institutional measures for securing the access to basic goods for human flourishing (Pogge). When reinterpreting Augustine and Xunzi in light of human dignity and human rights, I tackle two questions, following Pogge and Joas. First, I reinterpret Augustine and Xunzi by showing how human dignity rests on the relative worth of pursuing one’s flourishing distinct from animals and the absolute worth of pursuing flourishing open for self-transcendence, which also entails different ranges of social conceptions of flourishing. I also tackle how this sense of dignity leads to the entitlement to institutional measures for protecting the access to basic goods for human flourishing as the issue of human rights.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/5/264Human RightsHuman DignityuniversalismflourishingThomas PoggeHans Joas
spellingShingle Eun Young Hwang
Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing
Religions
Human Rights
Human Dignity
universalism
flourishing
Thomas Pogge
Hans Joas
title Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing
title_full Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing
title_fullStr Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing
title_full_unstemmed Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing
title_short Augustine and Xunzi on Human Dignity and Human Rights: The Worth of Being Human and Its Entitlement to Institutional Measures for Protecting the Access to Human Flourishing
title_sort augustine and xunzi on human dignity and human rights the worth of being human and its entitlement to institutional measures for protecting the access to human flourishing
topic Human Rights
Human Dignity
universalism
flourishing
Thomas Pogge
Hans Joas
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/5/264
work_keys_str_mv AT eunyounghwang augustineandxunzionhumandignityandhumanrightstheworthofbeinghumananditsentitlementtoinstitutionalmeasuresforprotectingtheaccesstohumanflourishing