Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control

A large-eddy simulation framework has been coupled with controller modules to systematically investigate the impacts of collective (CPC) and individual (IPC) pitch control strategies on utility-scale wind turbine energy production and fatigue loads. Wind turbine components were parameterized using a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Santoni, Ali Khosronejad, Peter Seiler, Fotis Sotiropoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722026415
_version_ 1797781954132705280
author Christian Santoni
Ali Khosronejad
Peter Seiler
Fotis Sotiropoulos
author_facet Christian Santoni
Ali Khosronejad
Peter Seiler
Fotis Sotiropoulos
author_sort Christian Santoni
collection DOAJ
description A large-eddy simulation framework has been coupled with controller modules to systematically investigate the impacts of collective (CPC) and individual (IPC) pitch control strategies on utility-scale wind turbine energy production and fatigue loads. Wind turbine components were parameterized using an actuator surface model to simulate the rotor blades and the turbine nacelle. The baseline CPC and IPC algorithms, consisting of single-input single-output proportional–integral controllers and two integral controllers, respectively, were incorporated into the numerical framework. A series of simulations were carried out to investigate the relative performance of the two controllers under various turbulent inflow conditions, spanning hub-height velocities of 7 to 14 m/s. The numerical simulation results of this study showed that, in comparison to the CPC, the IPC controller could successfully reduce the damage equivalent loads of utility-scale turbines at regions 2 and 3 of turbine operation by about 3% and 40%, respectively, without any penalty on the power production of the turbine. It was also shown that, despite its minor impact on the turbulence kinetic energy of the wake, the IPC controller did not influence the recovery of the turbine wake.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:04:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c94e0ea9db594861893c3ac6ff97cce2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4847
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:04:14Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Reports
spelling doaj.art-c94e0ea9db594861893c3ac6ff97cce22023-07-13T05:28:49ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472023-12-019793806Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch controlChristian Santoni0Ali Khosronejad1Peter Seiler2Fotis Sotiropoulos3Department of Civil Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of AmericaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America; Corresponding author.Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2102, United States of AmericaMechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, United States of AmericaA large-eddy simulation framework has been coupled with controller modules to systematically investigate the impacts of collective (CPC) and individual (IPC) pitch control strategies on utility-scale wind turbine energy production and fatigue loads. Wind turbine components were parameterized using an actuator surface model to simulate the rotor blades and the turbine nacelle. The baseline CPC and IPC algorithms, consisting of single-input single-output proportional–integral controllers and two integral controllers, respectively, were incorporated into the numerical framework. A series of simulations were carried out to investigate the relative performance of the two controllers under various turbulent inflow conditions, spanning hub-height velocities of 7 to 14 m/s. The numerical simulation results of this study showed that, in comparison to the CPC, the IPC controller could successfully reduce the damage equivalent loads of utility-scale turbines at regions 2 and 3 of turbine operation by about 3% and 40%, respectively, without any penalty on the power production of the turbine. It was also shown that, despite its minor impact on the turbulence kinetic energy of the wake, the IPC controller did not influence the recovery of the turbine wake.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722026415Large-eddy simulationControl co-designWind turbineCollective pitch controlIndividual pitch control
spellingShingle Christian Santoni
Ali Khosronejad
Peter Seiler
Fotis Sotiropoulos
Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control
Energy Reports
Large-eddy simulation
Control co-design
Wind turbine
Collective pitch control
Individual pitch control
title Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control
title_full Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control
title_fullStr Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control
title_full_unstemmed Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control
title_short Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control
title_sort toward control co design of utility scale wind turbines collective vs individual blade pitch control
topic Large-eddy simulation
Control co-design
Wind turbine
Collective pitch control
Individual pitch control
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722026415
work_keys_str_mv AT christiansantoni towardcontrolcodesignofutilityscalewindturbinescollectivevsindividualbladepitchcontrol
AT alikhosronejad towardcontrolcodesignofutilityscalewindturbinescollectivevsindividualbladepitchcontrol
AT peterseiler towardcontrolcodesignofutilityscalewindturbinescollectivevsindividualbladepitchcontrol
AT fotissotiropoulos towardcontrolcodesignofutilityscalewindturbinescollectivevsindividualbladepitchcontrol