A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo

Introduction: Vitiligo is an acquired, hypomelanotic disease, characterized by circumscribed depigmented macules. Phototherapy, which is the use of ultraviolet irradiation with or without exogenous photosensitizer is a well established treatment option. Psoralens with sunlight as the source of ultra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaaruni Ravishankar, Santoshdev P Rathod, Siddhartha Saikia, Raju G Chaudhary, Rekha B Solanki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Pigment International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pigmentinternational.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5847;year=2018;volume=5;issue=2;spage=96;epage=102;aulast=Ravishankar
_version_ 1811230805507178496
author Vaaruni Ravishankar
Santoshdev P Rathod
Siddhartha Saikia
Raju G Chaudhary
Rekha B Solanki
author_facet Vaaruni Ravishankar
Santoshdev P Rathod
Siddhartha Saikia
Raju G Chaudhary
Rekha B Solanki
author_sort Vaaruni Ravishankar
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Vitiligo is an acquired, hypomelanotic disease, characterized by circumscribed depigmented macules. Phototherapy, which is the use of ultraviolet irradiation with or without exogenous photosensitizer is a well established treatment option. Psoralens with sunlight as the source of ultraviolet A-rays is known as PUVASOL. Narrow band Ultraviolet B phototherapy (NBUVB; 311–313 nm) has been introduced over the past decade. Aims: To study the clinical effectiveness and assess the safety of NBUVB and PUVASOL therapy in Vitiligo patients. Methods: The patients were randomly allocated in to two groups containing 25 patients each. Group A patients received NBUVB with an initial dose of 250 mJ/cm2, incremented by 20% with each subsequent visit till optimum dose was achieved, twice a week on non-consecutive days. Group B patients received PUVASOL-oral Trimethylpsoralen or topical 0.2% w/w Trioxsalen followed by exposure to sunlight, twice a week on non-consecutive days. The extent of repigmentation was documented at regular intervals upto 6 months. Results: Amongst patients receiving NBUVB and PUVASOL, 56% and 48% had ≥50% repigmentation respectively. Disease was unstable in 48% and 36% of patients prior to commencement of therapy which reduced to 12% and 16% after therapy, respectively. 16% and 36% of the patients experienced side effects and 76% and 48% showed excellent colour match of the repigmented patches respectively. Conclusion: While both PUVASOL and NBUVB are both good therapeutic options; NBUVB therapy is found to be more effective and more cosmetically acceptable, with better colour matching of lesions and minimal adverse effects.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:35:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c95fcafe4fc045b893fb93dc907684d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2349-5847
2349-5782
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:35:09Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Pigment International
spelling doaj.art-c95fcafe4fc045b893fb93dc907684d82022-12-22T03:36:45ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPigment International2349-58472349-57822018-01-01529610210.4103/Pigmentinternational.Pigmentinternational_39_17A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligoVaaruni RavishankarSantoshdev P RathodSiddhartha SaikiaRaju G ChaudharyRekha B SolankiIntroduction: Vitiligo is an acquired, hypomelanotic disease, characterized by circumscribed depigmented macules. Phototherapy, which is the use of ultraviolet irradiation with or without exogenous photosensitizer is a well established treatment option. Psoralens with sunlight as the source of ultraviolet A-rays is known as PUVASOL. Narrow band Ultraviolet B phototherapy (NBUVB; 311–313 nm) has been introduced over the past decade. Aims: To study the clinical effectiveness and assess the safety of NBUVB and PUVASOL therapy in Vitiligo patients. Methods: The patients were randomly allocated in to two groups containing 25 patients each. Group A patients received NBUVB with an initial dose of 250 mJ/cm2, incremented by 20% with each subsequent visit till optimum dose was achieved, twice a week on non-consecutive days. Group B patients received PUVASOL-oral Trimethylpsoralen or topical 0.2% w/w Trioxsalen followed by exposure to sunlight, twice a week on non-consecutive days. The extent of repigmentation was documented at regular intervals upto 6 months. Results: Amongst patients receiving NBUVB and PUVASOL, 56% and 48% had ≥50% repigmentation respectively. Disease was unstable in 48% and 36% of patients prior to commencement of therapy which reduced to 12% and 16% after therapy, respectively. 16% and 36% of the patients experienced side effects and 76% and 48% showed excellent colour match of the repigmented patches respectively. Conclusion: While both PUVASOL and NBUVB are both good therapeutic options; NBUVB therapy is found to be more effective and more cosmetically acceptable, with better colour matching of lesions and minimal adverse effects.http://www.pigmentinternational.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5847;year=2018;volume=5;issue=2;spage=96;epage=102;aulast=RavishankarNBUVBphototherapypsoralenPUVASOLvitiligo
spellingShingle Vaaruni Ravishankar
Santoshdev P Rathod
Siddhartha Saikia
Raju G Chaudhary
Rekha B Solanki
A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo
Pigment International
NBUVB
phototherapy
psoralen
PUVASOL
vitiligo
title A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo
title_full A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo
title_fullStr A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo
title_full_unstemmed A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo
title_short A study of comparison of PUVASOL and NBUVB in patients with vitiligo
title_sort study of comparison of puvasol and nbuvb in patients with vitiligo
topic NBUVB
phototherapy
psoralen
PUVASOL
vitiligo
url http://www.pigmentinternational.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5847;year=2018;volume=5;issue=2;spage=96;epage=102;aulast=Ravishankar
work_keys_str_mv AT vaaruniravishankar astudyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT santoshdevprathod astudyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT siddharthasaikia astudyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT rajugchaudhary astudyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT rekhabsolanki astudyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT vaaruniravishankar studyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT santoshdevprathod studyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT siddharthasaikia studyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT rajugchaudhary studyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo
AT rekhabsolanki studyofcomparisonofpuvasolandnbuvbinpatientswithvitiligo