Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya

Abstract Background Smallholder farmers in developing countries are particularly vulnerable to climate shocks but often lack access to agricultural insurance. Weather index insurance (WII) could reduce some of the problems associated with traditional, indemnity-based insurance programs, but uptake h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth W. Sibiko, Prakashan C. Veettil, Matin Qaim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:Agriculture & Food Security
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40066-018-0200-6
_version_ 1818111476482703360
author Kenneth W. Sibiko
Prakashan C. Veettil
Matin Qaim
author_facet Kenneth W. Sibiko
Prakashan C. Veettil
Matin Qaim
author_sort Kenneth W. Sibiko
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Smallholder farmers in developing countries are particularly vulnerable to climate shocks but often lack access to agricultural insurance. Weather index insurance (WII) could reduce some of the problems associated with traditional, indemnity-based insurance programs, but uptake has been lower than expected. One reason is that WII contracts are not yet sufficiently tailored to the needs and preferences of smallholder farmers. This study combines survey and choice-experimental data from Kenya to analyze the experience with an existing WII program and how specific changes in the contractual design might encourage uptake. Results Many smallholders struggle with fully understanding the functioning of the program, which undermines their confidence. Regular provision of relevant rainfall measurements and thresholds would significantly increase farmers’ willingness to pay for WII. Mechanisms to reduce basis risk are also positively valued by farmers, although not to the same extent as higher levels of transparency. Finally, offering contracts to small groups rather than individual farmers could increase insurance uptake. Conclusions Better training on WII and regular communication are needed. Group contracts may help to reduce transaction costs. Farmer groups can also be important platforms for learning about complex innovations, including novel risk transfer products. These concrete results are specific to Kenya; however, they provide some broader policy-relevant insights into typical issues of WII in a small-farm context.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T03:03:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c96bdbc11d1f4ea3bb0a2e597430050c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-7010
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T03:03:39Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Agriculture & Food Security
spelling doaj.art-c96bdbc11d1f4ea3bb0a2e597430050c2022-12-22T01:22:59ZengBMCAgriculture & Food Security2048-70102018-07-017111410.1186/s40066-018-0200-6Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from KenyaKenneth W. Sibiko0Prakashan C. Veettil1Matin Qaim2Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, School of Agriculture and Food Security, Maseno UniversityInternational Rice Research InstituteDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of GoettingenAbstract Background Smallholder farmers in developing countries are particularly vulnerable to climate shocks but often lack access to agricultural insurance. Weather index insurance (WII) could reduce some of the problems associated with traditional, indemnity-based insurance programs, but uptake has been lower than expected. One reason is that WII contracts are not yet sufficiently tailored to the needs and preferences of smallholder farmers. This study combines survey and choice-experimental data from Kenya to analyze the experience with an existing WII program and how specific changes in the contractual design might encourage uptake. Results Many smallholders struggle with fully understanding the functioning of the program, which undermines their confidence. Regular provision of relevant rainfall measurements and thresholds would significantly increase farmers’ willingness to pay for WII. Mechanisms to reduce basis risk are also positively valued by farmers, although not to the same extent as higher levels of transparency. Finally, offering contracts to small groups rather than individual farmers could increase insurance uptake. Conclusions Better training on WII and regular communication are needed. Group contracts may help to reduce transaction costs. Farmer groups can also be important platforms for learning about complex innovations, including novel risk transfer products. These concrete results are specific to Kenya; however, they provide some broader policy-relevant insights into typical issues of WII in a small-farm context.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40066-018-0200-6Climate riskSmallholder farmersCrop insuranceDiscrete choice experimentAfrica
spellingShingle Kenneth W. Sibiko
Prakashan C. Veettil
Matin Qaim
Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya
Agriculture & Food Security
Climate risk
Smallholder farmers
Crop insurance
Discrete choice experiment
Africa
title Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya
title_full Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya
title_fullStr Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya
title_short Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya
title_sort small farmers preferences for weather index insurance insights from kenya
topic Climate risk
Smallholder farmers
Crop insurance
Discrete choice experiment
Africa
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40066-018-0200-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethwsibiko smallfarmerspreferencesforweatherindexinsuranceinsightsfromkenya
AT prakashancveettil smallfarmerspreferencesforweatherindexinsuranceinsightsfromkenya
AT matinqaim smallfarmerspreferencesforweatherindexinsuranceinsightsfromkenya