Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)

The aim of the experiment was to investigate the use and effect of a new beak-abrasive material not yet examined on mortality of non-beak trimmed laying hens of different genotypes housed in an alternative pen. The study was performed on 636 females belonging to three genotypes of Bábolna TETRA Ltd....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamás Péter Farkas, Attila Orbán, Sándor Szász, András Rapai, Erik Garamvölgyi, Zoltán Sütő
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/947
_version_ 1827680493117636608
author Tamás Péter Farkas
Attila Orbán
Sándor Szász
András Rapai
Erik Garamvölgyi
Zoltán Sütő
author_facet Tamás Péter Farkas
Attila Orbán
Sándor Szász
András Rapai
Erik Garamvölgyi
Zoltán Sütő
author_sort Tamás Péter Farkas
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the experiment was to investigate the use and effect of a new beak-abrasive material not yet examined on mortality of non-beak trimmed laying hens of different genotypes housed in an alternative pen. The study was performed on 636 females belonging to three genotypes of Bábolna TETRA Ltd. (a1 = commercial brown layer hybrid (C); a2 = purebred male line offspring group (maternal); a3 = purebfigure ed female line offspring group (paternal)). A total of 318 hens, i.e., 106 hens/genotype distributed in six pens (53 hens/pen), were evaluated. Cylindrical beak-abrasive blocks of 5.3–5.6 kg were suspended (0.1–0.4 mm diameter gravel, limestone grit, lime hydrate, and cement mixture) in six alternative pens. In six control pens without abrasive material, 318 hens, i.e., 106 hens/genotype (2 pens control group/genotype, i.e., C1 = commercial brown layer hybrid, C2 = purebred male line offspring group, C3 = purebred female line offspring group; 53 hens/pen;) were placed where there were no beak-abrasive materials. The rate of change in the weight of the beak-abrasive materials and the mortality rate were recorded daily. In the six pens equipped with beak-abrasive materials, infrared cameras were installed, and 24 h recordings were made. The number of individuals pecking the beak-abrasive material, the time and duration of dealing with the material were recorded. Data coming from one observation day are given. During the 13 experimental weeks of observation, the weight loss of beak-abrasives differed significantly in the different genotypes (a1 = 27.4%; a2 = 29.6%; a3 = 56.6%). During the only day analyzed, the hens from all the genotypes mostly stayed between 17:00 and 21:00 h in the littered scratching area where the beak-abrasive material was placed (a1 = 48.4%; a2 = 49.2%; a3 = 54.4%). In the case of each genotype, the rate of the hens dealing with beak-abrasives in the first two periods of the day was relatively low (0.2%–0.7%). Peaks of the activity were between 17:00 and 21:00 (a1 = 0.8%; a2 = 1.3%; a3 = 1.8%). The a3 dealt with the beak-abrasive materials to a significantly greater extent in the period from 13:00 to 17:00 (0.8%) and from 17:00 to 21:00 (1.8%) than the a1 (0.2% and 0.8%, respectively). Due to the use of the beak-abrasive materials, the mortality rate decreased the most in the genotypes that used them (a1 with beak-abrasive material 0.0% vs. C1 9.4%; a2 with beak-abrasive material 2.9% vs. C2 12.4%; a3 with beak-abrasive material) 15.4% vs. C3 5.7%). It can be concluded that the insertion of beak-abrasive materials increased the behavioral repertoire of hens, which is particularly beneficial from an animal welfare point of view. Further and longer-term research is needed to determine whether the insertion of the beak-abrasive material has a beneficial effect on the mortality data of the experimental groups through enrichment, either through physical abrasion of the beak or both.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:48:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c96d06eb05cc471283ce04378158a038
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:48:35Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-c96d06eb05cc471283ce04378158a0382023-11-22T17:04:41ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-09-01111094710.3390/agriculture11100947Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)Tamás Péter Farkas0Attila Orbán1Sándor Szász2András Rapai3Erik Garamvölgyi4Zoltán Sütő5Institute of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba Sándor Str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, HungaryBábolna TETRA Ltd., Radnóti Miklós Str. 16, H-2943 Bábolna, HungaryInstitute of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba Sándor Str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, HungaryInstitute of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba Sándor Str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, HungaryInstitute of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba Sándor Str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, HungaryInstitute of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba Sándor Str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, HungaryThe aim of the experiment was to investigate the use and effect of a new beak-abrasive material not yet examined on mortality of non-beak trimmed laying hens of different genotypes housed in an alternative pen. The study was performed on 636 females belonging to three genotypes of Bábolna TETRA Ltd. (a1 = commercial brown layer hybrid (C); a2 = purebred male line offspring group (maternal); a3 = purebfigure ed female line offspring group (paternal)). A total of 318 hens, i.e., 106 hens/genotype distributed in six pens (53 hens/pen), were evaluated. Cylindrical beak-abrasive blocks of 5.3–5.6 kg were suspended (0.1–0.4 mm diameter gravel, limestone grit, lime hydrate, and cement mixture) in six alternative pens. In six control pens without abrasive material, 318 hens, i.e., 106 hens/genotype (2 pens control group/genotype, i.e., C1 = commercial brown layer hybrid, C2 = purebred male line offspring group, C3 = purebred female line offspring group; 53 hens/pen;) were placed where there were no beak-abrasive materials. The rate of change in the weight of the beak-abrasive materials and the mortality rate were recorded daily. In the six pens equipped with beak-abrasive materials, infrared cameras were installed, and 24 h recordings were made. The number of individuals pecking the beak-abrasive material, the time and duration of dealing with the material were recorded. Data coming from one observation day are given. During the 13 experimental weeks of observation, the weight loss of beak-abrasives differed significantly in the different genotypes (a1 = 27.4%; a2 = 29.6%; a3 = 56.6%). During the only day analyzed, the hens from all the genotypes mostly stayed between 17:00 and 21:00 h in the littered scratching area where the beak-abrasive material was placed (a1 = 48.4%; a2 = 49.2%; a3 = 54.4%). In the case of each genotype, the rate of the hens dealing with beak-abrasives in the first two periods of the day was relatively low (0.2%–0.7%). Peaks of the activity were between 17:00 and 21:00 (a1 = 0.8%; a2 = 1.3%; a3 = 1.8%). The a3 dealt with the beak-abrasive materials to a significantly greater extent in the period from 13:00 to 17:00 (0.8%) and from 17:00 to 21:00 (1.8%) than the a1 (0.2% and 0.8%, respectively). Due to the use of the beak-abrasive materials, the mortality rate decreased the most in the genotypes that used them (a1 with beak-abrasive material 0.0% vs. C1 9.4%; a2 with beak-abrasive material 2.9% vs. C2 12.4%; a3 with beak-abrasive material) 15.4% vs. C3 5.7%). It can be concluded that the insertion of beak-abrasive materials increased the behavioral repertoire of hens, which is particularly beneficial from an animal welfare point of view. Further and longer-term research is needed to determine whether the insertion of the beak-abrasive material has a beneficial effect on the mortality data of the experimental groups through enrichment, either through physical abrasion of the beak or both.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/947laying hennon-cagednon-trimmedbeak abrasionbehavioraggressiveness
spellingShingle Tamás Péter Farkas
Attila Orbán
Sándor Szász
András Rapai
Erik Garamvölgyi
Zoltán Sütő
Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)
Agriculture
laying hen
non-caged
non-trimmed
beak abrasion
behavior
aggressiveness
title Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)
title_full Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)
title_fullStr Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)
title_full_unstemmed Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)
title_short Examination of the Usage of a New Beak-Abrasive Material in Different Laying Hen Genotypes (Preliminary Results)
title_sort examination of the usage of a new beak abrasive material in different laying hen genotypes preliminary results
topic laying hen
non-caged
non-trimmed
beak abrasion
behavior
aggressiveness
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/947
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaspeterfarkas examinationoftheusageofanewbeakabrasivematerialindifferentlayinghengenotypespreliminaryresults
AT attilaorban examinationoftheusageofanewbeakabrasivematerialindifferentlayinghengenotypespreliminaryresults
AT sandorszasz examinationoftheusageofanewbeakabrasivematerialindifferentlayinghengenotypespreliminaryresults
AT andrasrapai examinationoftheusageofanewbeakabrasivematerialindifferentlayinghengenotypespreliminaryresults
AT erikgaramvolgyi examinationoftheusageofanewbeakabrasivematerialindifferentlayinghengenotypespreliminaryresults
AT zoltansuto examinationoftheusageofanewbeakabrasivematerialindifferentlayinghengenotypespreliminaryresults