Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning

Unforeseen machine tool component failures cause considerable losses. This study presents a new approach to unsupervised machine component condition identification. It uses test cycle data of machine components in healthy and various faulty conditions for modelling. The novelty in the approach consi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Gittler, Stephan Scholze, Alisa Rupenyan, Konrad Wegener
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/4/3/86
_version_ 1797554867278970880
author Thomas Gittler
Stephan Scholze
Alisa Rupenyan
Konrad Wegener
author_facet Thomas Gittler
Stephan Scholze
Alisa Rupenyan
Konrad Wegener
author_sort Thomas Gittler
collection DOAJ
description Unforeseen machine tool component failures cause considerable losses. This study presents a new approach to unsupervised machine component condition identification. It uses test cycle data of machine components in healthy and various faulty conditions for modelling. The novelty in the approach consists of the time series representation as features, the filtering of the features for statistical significance, and the use of this feature representation to train a clustering model. The benefit in the proposed approach is its small engineering effort, the potential for automation, the small amount of data necessary for training and updating the model, and the potential to distinguish between multiple known and unknown conditions. Online measurements on machines in unknown conditions are performed to predict the component condition with the aid of the trained model. The approach was exemplarily tested and verified on different healthy and faulty states of a grinding machine axis. For the accurate classification of the component condition, different clustering algorithms were evaluated and compared. The proposed solution demonstrated encouraging results as it accurately classified the component condition. It requires little data, is straightforward to implement and update, and is able to precisely differentiate minor differences of faults in test cycle time series.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:38:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c96fa9184b964e53901429a1fef2c5ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-4494
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:38:12Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
spelling doaj.art-c96fa9184b964e53901429a1fef2c5ee2023-11-20T12:15:55ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942020-09-01438610.3390/jmmp4030086Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised LearningThomas Gittler0Stephan Scholze1Alisa Rupenyan2Konrad Wegener3Institute of Machine Tools and Manufacturing (IWF), ETH Zürich, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandAgathon AG, CH-4512 Bellach, SwitzerlandInspire AG, ETH Zürich, CH-8005 Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute of Machine Tools and Manufacturing (IWF), ETH Zürich, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandUnforeseen machine tool component failures cause considerable losses. This study presents a new approach to unsupervised machine component condition identification. It uses test cycle data of machine components in healthy and various faulty conditions for modelling. The novelty in the approach consists of the time series representation as features, the filtering of the features for statistical significance, and the use of this feature representation to train a clustering model. The benefit in the proposed approach is its small engineering effort, the potential for automation, the small amount of data necessary for training and updating the model, and the potential to distinguish between multiple known and unknown conditions. Online measurements on machines in unknown conditions are performed to predict the component condition with the aid of the trained model. The approach was exemplarily tested and verified on different healthy and faulty states of a grinding machine axis. For the accurate classification of the component condition, different clustering algorithms were evaluated and compared. The proposed solution demonstrated encouraging results as it accurately classified the component condition. It requires little data, is straightforward to implement and update, and is able to precisely differentiate minor differences of faults in test cycle time series.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/4/3/86condition monitoringmachine learningprognostics and health monitoringunsupervised learningmachine toolsmanufacturing
spellingShingle Thomas Gittler
Stephan Scholze
Alisa Rupenyan
Konrad Wegener
Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
condition monitoring
machine learning
prognostics and health monitoring
unsupervised learning
machine tools
manufacturing
title Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning
title_full Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning
title_fullStr Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning
title_full_unstemmed Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning
title_short Machine Tool Component Health Identification with Unsupervised Learning
title_sort machine tool component health identification with unsupervised learning
topic condition monitoring
machine learning
prognostics and health monitoring
unsupervised learning
machine tools
manufacturing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/4/3/86
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasgittler machinetoolcomponenthealthidentificationwithunsupervisedlearning
AT stephanscholze machinetoolcomponenthealthidentificationwithunsupervisedlearning
AT alisarupenyan machinetoolcomponenthealthidentificationwithunsupervisedlearning
AT konradwegener machinetoolcomponenthealthidentificationwithunsupervisedlearning